Boat location choice: The role of boating quality and excise taxes

Coastal Management

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 81-89

  Lipton, Douglas W ^a   Hicks, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Boating quality; Excise tax; Multinomial logit model; Recreational boating

Indexed keywords

BOATS; TAXATION;

BOATING QUALITY; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL;

COASTAL ENGINEERING;

BOATING;

EID: 0032920854     PISSN: 08920753     EISSN: 15210421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089207599263910     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bockstael, N. E., K. E. McConnell, and I. E. Strand. 1991. A random utility model for sportfishing: Some preliminary results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics 6:245–260.
2. Domencich, T. H., and D. McFadden. 1975. Urban travel demand. Amsterdam: North Holland. Levinson, A. 1996. Environmental regulation and manufacturers’ location choices: Evidence from the census of manufacturers. Journal of Public Economics 62:5–29.
3. Lipton, D. W. 1997. Boating in Maryland—Economic impacts from a healthy coastal environment. Economic Viewpoints 2:1–3.
4. Milon, J. W. 1988. A nested demand shares model of artificial marine habitat choice by sport anglers. Marine Resource Economics 5:191–214.
5. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Econometric Society Monographs no. 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. McConnell, V. D., and R. M. Schwab. 1990. The impact of environmental regulation on industry location decisions: The motor vehicle industry. Land Economics 66:67–81.
7. Parsons, G. R., and M. J. Kealy. 1992. Randomly drawn opportunity sets in random utility models of lake recreation. Land Economics 68:93–106.