Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 73-84

  Bian, Ling ^a   Butler, Rachael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION; AUTOCORRELATION; DATA PROCESSING; GEOSTATISTICS; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 0032920039     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Arbia, G., R. Benedetti, and G. Espa, 1996. Effects of the MAUP on image classification, Geographical Systems, 3(2):123-141.
2. Bian, L., and S.J. Walsh, 1993. Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in a mountainous environment of Montana, Professional Geographer, 45(1):1-11.
3. Brown, D.G., L. Bian, and S.J. Walsh, 1993. Response of a distributed watershed erosion model to variations in input data aggregation levels, Computers and Geosciences, 19(4):499-509.
4. Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 193 p.
5. Couclelis, H., 1992. People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS, Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space (A.U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, editors), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 65-77.
6. De Cola, L., 1994. Simulating and mapping spatial complexity using multi-scale techniques, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8(5):411-427.
7. Deutsch, C.V., and A.G. Journel, 1998. GSLIB-Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 369 p.
8. Ebleringer, J.R., and C.B. Field, 1993. Scaling Physiological Processes, Leaf to Globe, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 388 p.
9. Goodchild, M.F., and S. Gopal (editors), 1989. The Accuracy of Spatial Databases, Taylor & Francis, London, 290 p.
10. Gupta, V.K., I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, and E.F. Wood, 1986. Scale Problems in Hydrology, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, 245 p.
11. Hunter, G.J., and M.F. Goodchild, 1997. Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases, Geographical Analysis, 29(1):35-49.
12. Heuvelink, G.B.M., 1992. An interactive method for multidimensional simulation with nearest neighbor models, Proceedings of the 2nd CODATA Conference on Geomathematics and Geostatistics, Nancy, France, pp. 51-57.
13. Lam, N., and D.A. Quattrochi, 1992. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences, Professional Geographer, 44(1):88-98.
14. Lammers, R.B., L.E. Band, and C.L. Tague, 1997. Scaling behavior of watershed processes, Scaling-Up (P. van Gardinger, G. Foody, and P. Curran, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 295-317.
15. Levin, S.A., 1993. Concepts of scale at the local level, Scaling Physiological Processes, Leaf to Globe (J.R. Ebleringer and C.B. Field, editors), Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 7-19.
16. Mark, D.M., and P.B. Aronson, 1984. Scale dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping, Mathematical Geology, 16(7):671-683.
17. Nellis, M.D., and J.M. Briggs, 1989. The effect of spatial scale on Konza landscape classification using textural analysis, Landscape Ecology, 2(2):93-100.
18. Peuquet, D.J., 1988. Representation of geographic space: toward a conceptual synthesis, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78(3):375-394.
19. Quattrochi, D.A., and M.F. Goodchild, 1997. Scale, multiscaling, remote sensing, and GIS, Scaling of Remote Sensing Data for GIS (D.A. Quattrochi and M.F. Goodchild, editors), Lewis Publishers, New York, pp. 1-11.
20. Seyfried, M.S., and B.P. Wilcox, 1995. Scale and the nature of spatial variability: Field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling, Water Resources Research, 31(1):173-184.
21. Stoms, D., 1992. Effects of habitat map generalization in biodiversity assessment, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58(11):1587-1591.
22. Turner, M.G., R.V. O'Neill, R.H. Gardner, and B.T. Milne, 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern, Landscape Ecology, 3(3/4):153-162.
23. Vieux, B.E., 1993. DEM Aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 7(3):310-338.
24. Walsh, S.J., 1989. User consideration in landscape characterization, The Accuracy of Spatial Databases (M.F. Goodchild and S. Gopal, editors), Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 35-43.
25. Wolock, D.M., and C.V. Price, 1994. Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model, Water Resources Research, 30(11):3041-3052.
26. Zhang, W., and D.R. Montgomery, 1994. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations, Water Resources Research, 30(4):1019-1028.