Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 331-339

  Becker, Stephen ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Shorter, Stephanie ^a   King, Kaylin ^a   Patterson, Robert ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Depth perception; Disparity scaling; Stereoanomaly; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0032919393     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00110-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson B.L., Nakayama K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychology Review. 101:1994;414-445.
2. Finlay D.C., Manning M.L., Dunlop D.P., Dewis S.A. Difficulties in the definition of 'stereoscotoma' using temporal detection thresholds of dynamic random-dot stereograms. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 72:1989;161-173.
3. Gillam B., Chambers D., Russo T. Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 84(2):1988;163-165.
4. Harwerth R.S., Rawlings S.C. Viewing time and stereoscopic threshold with random-dot stereograms. American Journal of the Optometric Physiology and Optics. 54:1977;452-457.
5. Julesz B., Payne R. Difference between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception. Vision Research. 8:1968;433-444.
6. Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. 1971;University Chicago Press, Chicago.
7. Landers D., Cormack L. Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multi-component model of disparity processing. Perception and Psychophysics. 59:1997;219-231.
8. Manning M.L., Finlay D.C., Dewis S.A., Dunlop D.B. Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 79:1992;161-175.
9. Manning M.L., Finlay D.C., Neil R.A., Frost B.G. Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities. Vision Research. 27:1987;1683-1686.
10. Mustillo P. Binocular mechanisms mediating crossed and uncrossed stereopsis. Psychology Bulletin. 97:1985;187-201.
11. Ono H., Comerford T. Stereoscopic depth constancy. Epstein W. Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes. 1977;91-128 Wiley, New York.
12. Patterson R., Fox R. The effect of testing method on stereoanomaly. Vision Research. 25:1984;403-408.
13. Patterson R., Martin W. Human stereopsis. Human Factors. 34:1992;669-692.
14. Patterson R., Cayko R., Short L., Flanagan R., Moe L., Taylor E., Day P. Temporal integration differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics. 57:1995;891-897.
15. Patterson R., Moe L., Hewitt T. Factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays. Human Factors. 34:1992;655-667.
16. Richards W. Stereopsis and stereoblindness. Experimental Brain Research. 10:1970;380-388.
17. Richards W. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 61:1971;410-414.
18. Shetty S., Brodersen A., Fox R. System for generating dynamic random-element stereograms. Behavioral Research Methods Instrumentation. 11:1979;485-490.
19. Stevens K., Brookes A. Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research. 28(3):1988;371-386.
20. Uttal W.R., Fitzgerald J., Eskin T.E. Parameters of tachistoscopic stereopsis. Vision Research. 15:1975;705-712.
21. Wallach H., Zuckerman C. The constancy of stereoscopic depth. American Journal of Psychology. 76:1963;404-412.