Assistive technology patenting trends and the Americans with Disabilities Act

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 47-71

  Berven, Heidi M ^b   Blanck, Peter David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF LAW   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; LAW; PATENT; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES; WORK DISABILITY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATENTS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032917626     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199901/03)17:1<47::AID-BSL333>3.0.CO;2-2     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. R. (1989). Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos, 42, 171-180.
2. Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20, 251-259.
3. Ashford, N. A. (1985). Using regulation to change the market for innovation. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 9, 419-466.
4. Ashford, N. A. (1994). An innovation-based strategy for the environment. In A. M. Finkel & D. Golding (Eds.), Worst things first? The debate over risk-based national environmental priorities (pp. 275-314). Washington, DC: Resources Future.
5. Lepkowski, W. (1997). Public science drives innovation. Chemical and Engineering News, 24 (1 Sept.).