Why an outcome measures database?

Physiotherapy

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 234-235

  Hammond, Ralph ^a  

^a Chartered Society of Physiotherapy   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERNET; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 0032917484     PISSN: 00319406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61435-6     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (1997). 'Clinical effectiveness strategy', Professional Affairs and Educational Departments, CSP, London.
2. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (1999a). 'Clinical governance', CSP Policy Briefing, Government initiatives no 5. Professional Affairs Department, CSP, London.
3. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (1999b). 'The Information Resource Centre', Information Paper ERC 1, Education Department, CSP, London.
4. Chesson, R, Macleod, M and Massie, S (1996). 'Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland', Physiotherapy, 82, 12, 673-679.
5. Duckworth, M (1999). 'Outcome measurement selection and typology', Physiotherapy, 85, 1, 21-27.
6. McDowell, I and Newell, C (1996). Measuring Disease - A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, Oxford University Press.
7. National Health Service Executive (1999). 'Clinical governance, Quality in the new NHS', NHSE, Bristol.
8. Royal College of Physicians of London, British Geriatrics Society (1992). Standardised Assessment Scales for Elderly People, RCPL, London.
9. Turner-Stokes, L and Turner-Stokes, T (1997). 'The use of standardised outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK', Clinical Rehabilitation, 11, 306-313.
10. Warren, M and Tallis, R (1989). 'Measurement and the future of rehabilitation', Geriatric Medicine, 19, 1, 31.