Traditional health outcomes in the evaluation of diagnostic tests

Academic Radiology

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1999, Pages

  Bossuyt, P M M ^a   Lijmer, J G ^a   Beam, C A ^a   Campbell, G ^a   Burken, M I ^a   Greenfield, S ^a   Gatsonis, C ^a   Bree, R L ^a   Mushlin, A I ^a   Dorfman, G S ^a   Hillman, B ^a   Schulman, K ^a   Jarvik, J G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVALUATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 0032916875     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80092-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Kraemer HC Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines 1992 Sage Publications Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2. Jaeschke R Guyatt G Sackett DL Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 271 1994 389 391
3. Jaeschke R Guyatt GH Sackett DL Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 271 1994 703 707
4. Fryback DG Thornbury JR The efficacy of diagnostic imaging Med Decis Making 11 1991 88 94
5. Copley TT Wiggins S Dufrasne S Are we all of one mind? clinicians' and patients' opinions regarding the development of a service protocol for predictive testing for Huntington disease Am J Med Genet 58 1995 59 69
6. Benjamin CM Adam S Wiggins S Proceed with care: direct predictive testing for Huntington disease Am J Hum Genet 55 1994 606 617
7. Babul R Adam S Kremer B Attitudes toward direct predictive testing for the Huntington disease gene: relevance for other adult-onset disorders JAMA 270 1993 2321 2325
8. Kent DL Larson EB Disease, level of, and quality of research methods: three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging Invest Radiol 27 1992 245 254