Drug-induced changes in responding are dependent on baseline stimulus- reinforcer contingencies

Psychobiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 95-104

  Harper, David N ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC TRANSMISSION; DRUG INDUCED DISEASE; LEARNING; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0032916326     PISSN: 08896313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BRANCH, M. N. (1984). Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 447-452.
2. COHEN, S. L. (1986). A pharmacological examination of the resistance-to-change hypothesis of response strength. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 363-379.
3. DEWS, P. B., & WENGER, G. R. (1977). Rate dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In T. Thompson & P. B. Dews (Eds.), Advances in behavioral pharmacology (Vol. 1, pp. 167-227). New York: Academic Press.
4. EGLI, M., SCHAAL, D. W., THOMPSON, T., & CLEARY, J. (1992). Opioidinduced response-rate decrements in pigeons responding under variable-interval schedules: Reinforcement mechanisms. Behavioural Pharmacology, 3, 581-591.
5. FOURIEZOS, G., & WISE, R. A. (1976). Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: Response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Research, 103, 377-380.
6. GARDIER, A. M., LEPOUL, E., TROUVIN, J. H., CHANUT, E., DESSALLES, M. C., & JACQUOT, C. (1994). Changes in dopamine metabolism in rat forebrain regions after cessation of long-term fluoxetine treatment. Life Sciences, 54, 51-56.
7. HARPER, D. N. (1996). Response-independent food delivery and behavioral resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 549-560.
8. HARPER, D. N. (in press). Behavioural resistance to haloperidol and clozapine. Behavioural Processes.
9. HARPER, D. N., & MCLEAN, A. P. (1992). Resistance to change and the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 317-337.
10. HEYMAN, G. M. (1983). A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: Pimozide and amphetamine. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 113-122.
11. HEYMAN, G. M., KINZIE, D. L., & SEIDEN, L. S. (1986). Chloropromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Psychopharmacology, 88, 346-353.
12. HEYMAN, G. M., & SEIDEN, L. S. (1985). A parametric description of amphetamine's effects on response rate: Changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography. Psychopharmacology, 85, 154-161.
13. KOOB, G. F. (1992). Drugs of abuse: Anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 13, 177-184.
14. LJUNGBERG, T., APICELLA, P., & SCHULTZ, W. (1992). Responses of monkey dopamine neurones during learning of behavioral reactions: Anhedonia, motor deficit, or both? Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 27, 341-350.
15. LUCKI, I., & DELONG, R. E. (1983). Control rate of response or reinforcement and amphetamine's effect on behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 163-172.
16. 11C-labelled clozapine visualized by positron emission topography (PET) in drug-free schizophrenics and healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 99, 8-12.
17. LYON, M., & ROBBINS, T. (1975). The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: A general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In W. B. Essman & L. Valzelli (Eds.), Current developments in psychopharmacology (Vol. 2, pp. 80-162). New York: Spectrum.
18. NEVIN, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389-408.
19. NEVIN, J. A. (1984). Pavlovian determiners of behavioral momentum. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 363-370.
20. NEVIN, J. A. (1992). An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 301-316.
21. NEVIN, J. A., MANDELL, C., & ATAK, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 49-59.
22. NEVIN, J. A., TOTA, M. E., TORQUATO, R. D., & SHULL, R. L. (1990). Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 359-379.
23. OLDS, M. E., & FOBES, J. L. (1981). The central basis of motivation: Intracranial self-stimulation studies. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 523-574.
24. PHILIPS, G., WILLNER, P., & MUSCAT, R. (1991). Anatomical substrates for neuroleptic-induced reward attenuation and neuroleptic-induced response decrement. Behavioural Pharmacology, 2, 129-141.
25. ROLLS, E. T., ROLLS, B. J., KELLY, P. H., SHAW, S. G., WOOD, R. J., & DALE, R. (1974). The relative attenuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade. Psychopharmacologia, 38, 219-230.
26. SALAMONE, J. D., KURTH, P., MCCULLOUGH, L. D., & SOKOLOWSKI, J. D. (1995). The effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions on continuously reinforced operant responding: Contrasts with the effects of extinction. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 50, 437-443.
27. SANGER, D. J. (1986). Response decrement patterns after neuroleptic and non-neuroleptic drugs. Psychopharmacology, 89, 98-104.
28. STECKLER, T., & SAHGAL, A. (1995). The role of serotonergic-cholinergic interactions in the mediation of cognitive behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 67, 165-199.
29. TAYLOR, J. R., & ROBBINS, T. W. (1984). Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology, 84, 405-412.
30. WISE, R. A. (1982). Neuroleptics and operant behaviour: The anhedonia hypothesis. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 5, 39-87.
31. WISE, R. A., & BOZARTH, M. A. (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychological Review, 94, 469-492.