Tits, warblers, and finches: Foliage-gleaning birds of nearctic and palearctic boreal forests

Condor

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 299-310

  Greenberg, Russell ^a   Pravosudov, Vladimir ^b,d   Sterling, John ^a   Kozlenko, Anna ^c   Kontorshchikov, Vitally ^c  

^a SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Purdue University ^*  (Russian Federation)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boreal forests; Community convergence; Community structure; Continental comparison; Foliage gleaning bird; Fringilla; Warblers

Indexed keywords

AVES; FRINGILLA; FRINGILLA COELEBS; FRINGILLIDAE; NEARCTIC;

EID: 0032915532     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1369993     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANGELL-JACOBSEN, B. 1980. Overlap in feeding pattern between Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus and Brambling Fringilla montifringilla in two forest habitats in western Norway. Ornis Scand. 11: 146-154.
2. BERMINGHAM, E., S. ROHWER, S. FREEMAN, AND C. WOOD. 1992. Vicariance biogeography in the Pleistocene and speciation in North American wood warblers: a test of Mengel's model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89:6624-6628.
3. BLONDEL, J. 1990. Biogeography and history of forest bird faunas in the Mediterranean Zone, p. 95-109. In A. Keast [ed.], Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.
4. CRAMP, S., AND C. M. PERRINS. 1994. Handbook of birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. VIII: Crows to finches. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
5. ERSKINE, A. J. 1977. Birds in boreal Canada. Can. Wildl. Serv. Rep. Ser. 41.
6. FONSTAD, T. 1984. Reduced territorial overlap between the Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus and the Brambling Fringilla montifringilla in heath forests: competition of different habitat preferences. Oikos 42:314-322.
7. GILL, F. B., A. MOSTROM, AND A. L. MACK. 1993. Speciation in North American chickadees. I. Patterns of MtDNA genetic divergence. Evolution 47:195-212.
8. HAILA, Y., AND O. JÄRVINEN. 1990. Northern conifer forests and their bird species assemblages, p. 61-97. In A. Keast [ed.], Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.
9. HAILA, Y., O. JÄRVINEN, AND S. RAIVIO. 1987. Quantitative versus qualitative distribution patterns of birds in the western Palearctic taiga. Annales Zoologici Fennici 24:179-195.
10. HERRERA, C. M. 1978. On the breeding distribution pattern of European migrant birds: MacArthur's theme reexamined. Auk 95:496-509.
11. HOGSTAD, O. 1975. Interspecific relations between Willow Warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) and Brambling (Fringilla montifringilla) in subalpine forests. Norwegian J. Zool. 23:223-234.
12. HUTTO, R. L., S. M. PLETSCHET, AND P. HENDRICKS. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for non-breeding and breeding season use. Auk 103:593-602.
13. JOHNSTON, R. F., AND W. J. KLITZ. 1977. Variation and evolution in a granivorous bird: the House Sparrow, p. 15-51. In S. C. Kendeigh and J. Pinowski [eds.], Granivorous birds in ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
14. MACARTHUR, R. 1959. On the breeding distribution pattern of North American migrant birds. Auk 76: 318-325.
15. MARSHALL, H. D., AND A. J. BAKER. In press. Mitochondrial DNA control-region sequences indicate a sequential range expansion and low current levels of gene flow among European populations of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs). Mol. Ecol.
16. MÖNKKÖNEN, M. 1994. Diversity patterns in Palearctic and Nearctic forest bird assemblages. J. Biogeography 21:183-195.
17. MÖNKKÖNEN, M., P. HELLE, G. J. NIEMI, AND K. MONTGOMERY. 1997. Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding communities. Can. J. Zool. 75: 2077-2083.
18. MÖNKKÖNEN, M., AND D. WELSH. 1994. A biogeographic hypothesis on the effects of human caused landscape changes on the forest bird communities of Europe and North America. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:61-70.
19. MORSE, D. H. 1989. American warblers: an ecological and behavioral perspective. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. MURTON, R. K. 1971. Man and birds. Collins, London.
21. NEWTON, I. 1967. The adaptive radiation and feeding ecology of some British finches. Ibis 109:33-108.
22. O'CONNOR, R. J., AND M. SHRUBB. 1986. Farming and birds. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
23. PETIT, D. R., L. J. PETIT, V. A. SAAB, AND T. E. MARTIN. 1995. Fixed-radius point counts in forests: factors influencing effectiveness and efficiency, p. 49-56. In C. J. Ralph, S. Droege, and J. Sauer [eds.], Monitoring bird population trends by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PSW-GTR 149. USDA For. Serv. Albany, CA.
24. RABENOLD, K. N. 1978. Foraging strategies, diversity, and seasonality in bird communities of Appalachian spruce-fir forests. Ecol. Monogr. 48:397-424.
25. RICHMAN, A. D. 1996. Ecological diversification and community structure in the Old World leaf warblers (genus Phylloscopus): a phylogenetic perspective. Evolution 50:2461-2470.
26. ROGACHEVA, H. 1992. The birds of central Siberia. Hussum Druck-und Verlagsggesellschaft, Husum, Germany.
27. SHELDON, F. H., AND F. B. GILL. 1996. A reconsideration of songbird phylogeny, with emphasis on the evolution of titmice and their Silvioid relatives. Syst. Biol. 45:473-495.
28. WIENS, J. A. 1975. Avian communities, energetics, and functions in coniferous forest habitats, p. 226-265. In Proceedings of the symposium on management of forest and range habitats for nongame birds. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-1. U.S. For. Serv., Washington, DC.
29. WILKINSON, L. 1990. The system for statistics. Systat Inc., Evanston, IL.