Multiple region MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 774-786

  Nagle, S K ^a   Levin, D N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Fourier imaging; Image reconstruction; Magnetic resonance angiography; Sampling

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; FAST FOURIER TRANSFORMS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SAMPLING;

FOURIER IMAGING; HIGH SPATIAL FREQUENCY; LOW-SPATIAL FREQUENCY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NOISE AMPLIFICATION; SAMPLING THEOREMS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIMULATION;

EID: 0032914023     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199904)41:4<774::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bracewell RN. The Fourier transform and its applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
2. Whittaker ET. On the functions which are represented by the expansion of interpolating theory. Proc R Soc Edinburgh 1915;35:181-194.
3. Kotel'nikov VA. On the transmission capacity of "ether" and wire in electrocommunications (Russian). In: Izd Red Upr Svyazi RKKA, Moscow, 1933.
4. Shannon CE. Communications in the presence of noise. Proc IRE 1949;37:10-21.
5. Hu X, Parrish T. Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:691-694.
6. Parrish TB, Hu X. A hybrid technique for dynamic imaging. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med, New York, 1996. p 394.
7. Fredrickson JO, Pelc NJ. Temporal resolution improvement in dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:621-625.
8. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, Tuithof HH, Engels H, Nelson RC, Gerety BM, Chezmar JL, den Boer JA. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
9. Liang Z-P, Boada FE, Constable RT, Haacke EM, Lauterbur PC, Smith MR. Constrained reconstruction methods in MR imaging. Rev Magn Reson Med 1992;4:67-185.
10. Liang Z-P, Lauterbur PC. Constrained imaging: overcoming the limitations of the Fourier series. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1996;September-October: 126-132.
11. Nagle SK, Levin DN, Kuperman VY. A new sampling theorem for FT MRI of multiple regions. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med, Sydney, 1998. p 187.
12. Levin DN, Nagle SK. A new class of sampling theorems for Fourier imaging of multiple regions. Proc IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Chicago, 1998. Vol 2, p 10-14.
13. Cloft HJ, Murphy KJ, Prince MR, Brunberg JA. 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14: 593-600.
14. Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206: 283-289.
15. Wilman AH, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, King BF, Johnson CD, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ. Fluoroscopically-triggered contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR angiography. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med, Vancouver, 1997. p 202.
16. Foo TKF, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203:275-280.
17. Alley MT, Shifrin RY, Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ. Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: state of the art. Radiographics 1998;18:273-285.
18. Hamming RW. Digital filters. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982.
19. Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Fram EK, Keller PJ, Bird CR, Hodak JA, Flom RA. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992;182:761-768.
20. Huston J III, Lewis BD, Wiebers DO, Meyer FB, Riederer SJ, Weaver AL. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339-344.
21. Wildy KS, Yuan C, Tsuruda JS, Ferguson MS, Wen N, Subramaniam DS, Strandness DE. Atherosclerosis of the carotid artery: evaluation by magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:726-732.
22. Urchuk SN, Plewes DB. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:453-462.
23. Kruger RA, Riederer SJ. Basic concepts of digital subtraction angiography. Boston: G.K. Hall; 1984.
24. Kruger RA, Liu P-Y. Digital angiography using a matched filter. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1982;1:16-21.
25. Jerri AJ. The Shannon sampling theorem - its various extensions and applications: a tutorial review. Proc IEEE 1977;65:1565-1596.
26. Higgins JR. Sampling theory in Fourier and signal analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996.
27. Bezuglaya L, Katsnelson V. The sampling theorem for functions with limited multi-band spectrum I. Zeitsch Anal Anwend 1993;12:511-534.
28. Venkataramani R, Bresler Y. Sub-Nyquist sampling of multiband signals: perfect reconstruction and bounds on aliasing error. Proc IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1998. p 1633-1636.
29. Cheung, KF. A multidimensional extension of Papoulis' generalized sampling expansion with the application in minimum density sampling. In: Marks RJ, editor. Advanced topics in Shannon sampling and interpolation theory. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993.
30. Papoulis A. Generalized sampling expansion. IEEE Trans Circuits Systems 1977;24:652-654.
31. Cao Y, Levin DN. MR imaging with spatially variable resolution. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:701-709.
32. Cao Y, Levin DN, Yao L. Locally focused MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:858-867.
33. Yao L, Cao Y, Levin DN. 2D locally focused MRI: applications to dynamic and spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:834-846.
34. Kuperman VY, Nagle SK, Alley MT, Glover GH, Levin DN. Locally-focused contrast-enhanced carotid MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging accepted for publication.
35. Kuperman VY, Nagle SK, Levin DN. Locally focused MR imaging of interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1288-1295.
36. Yang GZ, Burger P, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN. Locally focused 3D coronary imaging using volume-selective RF excitation. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:171-178.
37. Chandra S, Liang Z-P, Webb A, Lee H, Morris HD, Lauterbur PC. Application of reduced-encoding imaging with generalized-series reconstruction (RIGR) in dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:783-797.
38. Cao Y, Levin DN. Feature-recognizing MRI. Magn Reson Med 1993;30: 305-317.
39. Cao Y, Levin DN. Using an image database to constrain the acquisition and reconstruction of MR images of the human head. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:350-351.
40. Cao Y, Levin DN. Using prior knowledge of human anatomy to constrain MR image acquisition and reconstruction: half k-space and full k-space techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:669-677.
41. Zientara GP, Panych LP, Jolesz FA. Dynamically adaptive MRI with encoding by singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 1994;32: 268-274.
42. Cao Y, Levin DN. On the relationship between feature-recognizing MRI and MRI encoded by singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:140-142.
43. Kurucay S, Schmalbrock P. Analysis of SVD encoded imaging in the presence of in-plane motion. Proc., Soc Magn Reson, Nice, 1995. p 755.
44. Duerk JL, Wu DH, Chung YC, Liang Z-P, Lewin JS. A simulation study to assess SVD encoding for interventional MRI: effect of object rotation and needle insertion. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:957-960.
45. Hanson JM, Liang Z-P, Magin RL, Duerk JL, Lauterbur PC. A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods. Magn Reson Med 1997;38: 161-167.