Needle-localized breast biopsy for mammographic abnormalities: A community hospital experience

American Surgeon

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 283-288

  Tran, De Q ^a   Wilkerson, Donald K ^b   Namm, Joel ^a   Zeis, Margaret A ^a   Cottone, F John ^a  

^a ST FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, COMMUNITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0032911226     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Cancer Society, Inc. Cancer Facts and Figures -1997. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1997.
2. Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, et al. The new era in breast cancer: Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996; 131:301-8.
3. Strax P. Detection of breast cancer. Cancer 1990;66(Suppl): 1336-40.
4. Snell MJ, Ostrow LB, DuBois JJ. Needle-localized biopsy of occult breast lesion: An update. Milit Med 1992;157:61-4.
5. Symmonds RE, Roberts JW. Management of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. Ann Surg 1987;205:520-8.
6. McKenna RJ. The abnormal mammogram radiographic findings, diagnostic options, pathology, and stage of cancer diagnosis. Cancer 1994;74(Suppl):244-55.
7. Stems EE. The abnormal mammogram in women with clinically normal breasts. Can J Surg 1995;38:168-72.
8. Schwartz GF, Carter DL, Conant EF, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: Nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential. Cancer 1994;73:1660-5.
9. Opie H, Estes NC, Jewell WR, et al. Breast biopsy for nonpalpable lesions: A worthwhile endeavor? Am Surg 1993;59: 490-4.
10. Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, Fieler MA. Breast biopsy with needle localization: Influence of age and mammographic feature on the rate of malignancy in 350 nonpalpable lesions. Surgery 1991;110:623-8.
11. Meyer JE, Eberlein TJ, Stomper PC, Sonnenfeld MR. Biopsy of occult breast lesions: Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. JAMA 1990;263:2341-3.
12. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™), 2nd Ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995.
13. Wilhelm MC, Edge SB, Cole DD, et al. Nonpalpable invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 1991;213:600-5.
14. Franceschi D, Crowe JP, Lie S, et al. Not all nonpalpable breast cancer are alike. Arch Surg 1991;126:967-71.
15. Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: Diagnosis with slightly overpenetrated film-screen mammography and hook wire directed biopsy in 1,014 cases. Radiology 1989;171:633-8.
16. Thompson WR, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, et al. Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: A 5-year study. Arch Surg 1991;126:730-4.
17. Papatestas AE, Hermann D, Hermann G, et al. Surgery for nonpalpable lesions. Arch Surg 1990;125:399-402.
18. Shields MW, Smith RS, Bardwil MF, Harness JK. Is needle-directed breast biopsy overused? West J Med 1994;160: 229-31.
19. Bassett LW. Standardized reporting for mammography: BI-RADS™. Breast J 1997;3:207-10.
20. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-8.
21. Lein BC, Alex WR, Zebley M, Pezzi CM. Results of needle localized breast biopsy in women under age 50. Am J Surg 1996;171:356-9.
22. Sickles EA. Quality assurance: How to audit your own mammography practice. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:265-75.
23. Hillner BE, Bear HD, Fajardo LL. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic biopsy for nonpalpable breast abnormalities: A decision analysis model. Acad Radiol 1996;3: 351-60.
24. Cody HS III. Mammographic screening: A surgeon's perspective. Breast J 1997;3(Suppl):26-31.
25. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: Analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997;202:849-54.
26. Nguyen M, McCombs MM, Ghandehari S, et al. An update on core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions. Cancer 1996;78:2340-5.