In vitro versus in vivo genetic divergence in potato

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 299-304

  Gopal, J ^a  

^a CENTRAL POTATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Genetic divergence; In vitro; In vivo; Mahalanobis D2 statistic; Potato; Solanum tuberosum

Indexed keywords

GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENOTYPE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT VARIETY;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 0032905926     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051072     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amirouche L, Stauchbury T, Matthews S (1985) Comparisons of cultivar performance on different nutrient media in a routine method for potato micropropagation. Potato Res 28: 469-477
2. Damerval C, Hebert Y, de Vienne D (1987) Is the polymorphism of protein amounts related to phenotypic variability? A comparison of two-dimensional electrophoresis data with morphological traits in maize. Theor Appl Genet 74:194-202
3. Dillon WR, Goldstein M (1984) Multivariateanalysis. Methods and applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York
4. Gaur PC, Gupta PK, Kishore H (1978) Studies on genetic divergence in potato. Euphytica 27:361-368
5. Glendinning DR (1975) Neo-tuberosum, new potato breeding material. I. The origin, composition and development of the Tuberosum and Neo-tuberosum gene pool. Potato Res 18: 256-261
6. Copal J (1996) In vitro selection, genetic divergence and cross prediction in potato. PhD thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
7. Gopal J, Minocha JL (1997) Genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato. Euphytica 97:269-275
8. Henry Y, Vain P, Buyser J De (1994) Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture response and regeneration capacities, Euphytica 79:45-58
9. Hougas RW, Ross RW (1956) The use of foreign introductions in breeding American potato varieties. Am Potato J 33: 328-339
10. Lefort-Bunson M, Guillot-Lemoine B, Dattee Y (1986) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Use of different indications of genetic divergence in a 7 × 7 diallel. Agronomie 6:839-844
11. Loiselle F, Tai GCC, Christie BR (1991) Pedigrees, agronomic and molecular divergence of parents in relation to progeny performance in potato. Potato Res 34:305-316
12. Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 2:49-55
13. Maroti M, Rudolf J, Pozsar BI (1980) Experiments with the in vitro production of potato plants from meristematic shoot tips. Bot-Kozlemenyek 67:237-243
14. Miller PR, Amirouche L, Stuchbury T, Matthews S (1985) The use of plant growth regulators in the micropropagation of slow-growing potato cultivars. Potato Res 28:479-486
15. Morrison DF (1976) Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd., Tokyo London New Delhi Paris Sydney
16. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497
17. Rao CR (1952) Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. John Wiley and Sons, New York
18. Ross H (1958) Kartoffel. II. Ausgangs material fur die Zuchtung. In: Kappert H, Rudorf W (eds) Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung III. Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, pp 43-59
19. Sidhu AS, Pandita ML, Arora SK (1981) Studies on genetic divergence in potato. J Ind Pot Assoc 8:12-17
20. Simmonds NW (1962) Variability in crop plants, its use and conservation. Biol Rev 37:422-465
21. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1977) Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publications, Ludhiana, New Delhi
22. Spark DN (1973) Euclidean cluster analysis algorithm. Appl Stat 22:126-130
23. Swaminathan MS (1958) The origin of the early European potato-evidence from Indian varieties. Ind J Genet Pl Breed 18:8-15
24. Van der Plank JE (1946) Origin of the first European potatoes and their reaction to length of day. Nature 157:503-515