Digital fundus imaging: A quality and cost comparison with 35-mm film

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 79-82

  Prasad, S ^a   Bannon, P ^b   Clearkin, L G ^b   Phillips, R P ^b  

^a ARROWE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Colour fundus images; Digital imaging; Fundus photography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE FUNDUS; HUMAN; IMAGING; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032905799     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770118.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Friberg TR, Rehkopf PG, Warnicki JW & Eller AW (1987): Use of directly acquired digital fundus and fluorescein angiographic images in the diagnosis of retinal disease. Retina 7: 246-251.
2. George LD, Leverton C, Young S, Lusty J, Dunstan FD & Owens DR (1997): Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopaghy. Diabetic Medicine 14: 970-973.
3. Higgs ER, Harney BA, Keller A & Reckless JP (1991): Detection of diabetic retinopathy in the community using a non-mydriatic camera. Diabetic Medicine 8: 551-555.
4. Rapkin JS, Rapkin KM & Wilson GW (1991): Digital fundus imaging: a comparison with photographic techniques. Ann Ophthalmol 23: 46-53.
5. Williams R, Nussey S, Humphry R & Thompson G (1986): Assessment of non-mydiatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy. Br Med J 293: 1140-1142.