Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

Anaesthesia

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-67

  Djaiani, G ^a,b   Ribes Pastor, M P ^a  

^a MORRISTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anaesthetics, intravenous; propofol; Surgery; day case

Indexed keywords

ALFENTANIL; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; APNEA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHETICS, COMBINED; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROPOFOL;

EID: 0032904229     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00658.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hug CC, McLeskey CH, Nahrwold NL, et al. Haemodynamic effects of propofol-data from 24771 patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1993; 76: S154.
2. Billard V, Moulla F, Bourgain JL, Megnigbeto A, Stanski DR. Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1384-93.
3. Harris CE, Murray AM, Anderson JM, Grounds RM, Morgan M. Effects of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1988; 43(Suppl.): 32-6.
4. -1. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 67: 618-20.
5. Vohra A, Thomas AN, Harper NJN, Pollard BJ. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation: thiopentone and propofol compared. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 67: 64-8.
6. Short TG, Plummer JL, Chui PT. Hypnotic and anaesthetic interactions between midazolam, propofol and alfentanil. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 69: 162-7.
7. Vinik HR, Bradley EL, Kissin I. Triple anesthetic combination: propofol-midazolam-alfentanil. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 78: 354-8.
8. McClune S, McKay AC, Wright PMC, et al. Synergistic interactions between midazolam and propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 69: 240-5.
9. Tighe KE, Warner JA. The effect of co-induction with midazolam upon recovery from propofol infusion anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 1000-4.
10. Elwood T, Huchcroft S, MacAdams C. Midazolam coinduction does not delay discharge after very brief propofol anaesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 42: 114-8.
11. DeLucia JA, White PF. Effect of midazolam on induction and recovery characteristics of propofol. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1992; 74: S63.
12. Godsiff L, Magee L, Park GR. Propofol versus propofol with midazolam for laryngeal mask insertion. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1995; 12(Suppl.): 35-40.
13. Clarkson K, Power CK, O'Connell F, Pathmakanthen S, Burke CM. A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1993; 104: 1029-31.
14. Chassard D, Sakhr R, Bouletreau P. Outpatient anaesthesia with propofol or midazolam in combination with alfentanil: a comparison. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1996; 76(2): A25.
15. Driver IK, Wiltshire S, Mills P, Lillywhite N, Howard-Griffin R. Midazolam co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 782-4.