Comparison of methods for determining bulk densities of rocky forest soils

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 379-383

  Page Dumroese, Deborah S ^a   Jurgensen, Martin F ^b   Brown, Robert E ^a   Mroz, Glenn D ^b  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE SAMPLES; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); EXCAVATION; FORESTRY; GAGES; RADIATION; VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS;

NUCLEAR MOISTURE DENSITY GAUGE; ROCKY FOREST SOILS; SOIL BULK DENSITY; SOIL COARSE FRAGMENTS;

SOILS;

BULK DENSITY; FOREST SOIL; MEASUREMENT METHOD;

MONTANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032902867     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300020016x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andraski, B.J. 1991. Balloon and core sampling for determining bulk density of alluvial desert soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1188-1190.
2. Aust, W.M., M.D. Tippett, J.A. Burger, and W.H. McKee, Jr. 1995. Compaction and rutting during harvesting affect better drained soils more than poorly drained soils on wet pine flats. South. J. Appl. For. 19(2):72-77.
3. Blake, G.R., and K.H. Hartge. 1986. Bulk density, p. 363-375. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Agronomy 9. ASA, Madison, WI.
4. th North Am. Forest Soils Conf. Vancouver, BC. July 1988. Forestry Publ., Vancouver, BC.
5. Corns, I.G.W. 1988. Compaction by forestry equipment and effects on coniferous seedling growth on four soils in the Alberta foothills. Can. J. For. Res. 18:75-84.
6. Courtin, P., M.C. Feller, and K. Klinka. 1983. Lateral variability in some properties of disturbed forest soils in southwestern British Columbia. Can. J. Soil. Sci. 63:529-539.
7. Cunningham, R.L., and R.P. Matelski. 1968. Bulk density measurements of certain soils high in coarse fragments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 32:109-111.
8. Edwards, W.M., P.F. Germann, L.B. Owens, and C.R. Amerman. 1984. Watershed studies of factors influencing infiltration, runoff, and erosion on stony and nonstony soils, p. 45-54. In J.D. Nichols et al. (ed.). Erosion and productivity of soils containing rock fragments. SSSA Spec. Publ. 13. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
9. Farrish, K.W., J.C. Adams, and C.G. Vidrine. 1995. Survival and growth of planted loblolly pine seedlings on a severely rutted site. Tree Plant. Notes. 4:29-32.
10. Federer, C.A., D.E. Turcotte, and C.T. Smith. 1993. The organic fraction - bulk density relationship and the expression of nutrient content in forest soils. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1026-1032.
11. Fleming, R.L., T.A. Black, and N.R. Eldridge. 1993. Water content, bulk density, and coarse fragment content measurement in forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:261-270.
12. Flint, A.L., and S. Childs. 1984. Development and calibration of an irregular hole bulk density sampler. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:374-378.
13. Geist, J.M., J.W. Hazard, and K.W. Seidel. 1989. Assessing physical conditions of some Pacific northwest volcanic ash soils after forest harvest. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:946-950.
14. Harvey, A.E., M.F. Jurgensen, and M.J. Larsen. 1979. Comparative distribution of ectomycorrhizae in soils of three western Montana forest habitat types. For. Sci. 25:350-358.
15. Howard, R.F., and M.J. Singer. 1981. Measuring forest soil bulk density using irregular hole, paraffin clod, and air permeability. For. Sci. 27:316-322.
16. Jurgensen, M.F., M.J. Larsen, and A.E. Harvey. 1977. A soil sampler for steep, rocky sites. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note INT-RN-217.
17. Jurgensen, M.F., A.E. Harvey, and M.J. Larsen. 1981. Effects of prescribed fire on soil nitrogen levels in a cutover Douglas fir/western larch forest. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-275.
18. Kohl, K.D. 1988. Mechanics of rill headcutting. Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
19. Lichter, J.M., and L.R. Costello. 1994. An evaluation of volume excavation and core sampling techniques for measuring soil bulk density. J. Arboric. 20:160-164.
20. McLintock, T.F. 1959. A method for obtaining soil-samples volumes in stony soils. J. For. 832-834.
21. McNabb, D.H., K. Cromack, Jr. and R.L. Fredricksen. 1986. Variability of nitrogen and carbon in surface soils of six forest types in the Oregon Cascades. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1037-1041.
22. Mroz, G.D., and D.D. Reed. 1991. Forest soil sampling efficiency: matching laboratory analyses and field sampling procedures. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1413-1416.
23. Muller, R.N., and M.E. Hamilton. 1992. A simple, effective method for determining the bulk density of stony soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23:313-319.
24. Pfister, R.D., B.L. Kovalchik, S.F. Arno, and R.C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-34.
25. Powers, R.F. 1991. Are we maintaining productivity of forest lands? Establishing guidelines through a network of long-term studies. p. 70-89. In A.E. Harvey and L.F. Neuenschwander (compilers). Proc., Management and productivity of western-montane forest soils. Boise, ID. 10-12 April 1990. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-280.
26. Rolf, K. 1994. A review of preventative and loosening measures to alleviate soil compaction in tree planting areas. J. Arboric. 18: 431-448.
27. Steinbrenner, E.C. 1979. Forest soil productivity relationships, p. 199-231. In P.E. Heilman et al. (ed.) Forest Soils of the Douglas-fir Region. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.
28. Tisdall, A.L. 1951. Comparison of methods of determining apparent density of soils. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2:349-354.
29. Whalley, W.R., E. Dumitru, and A.R. Dexter. 1995. Biological effects of soil compaction. Soil Tillage Res. 35:53-68.