The identity of clones

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 67-76

  Evers, Kathinka ^a,b  

^a ICSU International Council for Science   (Norway)

^b ICSU International Council for Science   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cloning; Identity; Indiscernibility; Individuation; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CLONING; COGNITION; GENE TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; IDENTITY; INDIVIDUALITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; NONHUMAN; PERSONALITY; REVIEW; SHEEP;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CLONING; GENETIC IDENTITY; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; NATURAL LAW; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; RIGHTS;

ANIMALS; CLONING, ORGANISM; ETHICS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INDIVIDUATION; PERSONALITY; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 0032899702     PISSN: 03605310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/jmep.24.1.67.2537     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Brem, G. (1997). Presentation at the XXXVIth Meeting of the Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology, the European Commission.
2. Evers, K. (1991). Plurality of Thought, Library of Theoria, Berlings Förlag, Arlöv.
3. Feinsilber, M. (1997). 'Sheep boggles the human mind,' Washington Post, April 6.
4. Gorovitz, S. (1982). Doctors Dilemmas, Oxford University Press, India.
5. Hubbard, R. (1997). 'Irreplaceable ewe,' The Nation, March 24.
6. Leibniz, G.W. (1686). Discours de Métaphysique.
7. Silver, L. (1997). 'Who says Mother Nature knows best?' Focus, The Sunday Times, March 2.
8. Wertz, D. (1997). 'Cloning humans: Is it ethical?' The Gene Letter, Vol. 1, Issue 5, March.
9. Wilmut, I. et al. (1997). 'Viable offspring derived from fetal and mammalian cells,' Nature 385, 810-811.