Target detection against narrow band noise backgrounds

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 13, 1999, Pages 2191-2203

  Cannon, Mark W ^a   Reese, Greg J ^b   Fullenkamp, Steven C ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Logicon Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection; Discrimination; Filtering; Texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION;

EID: 0032898805     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00330-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ahumada A.J. Jr., Watson A.B., Rohaly A.M. Models of human image discrimination predict object detection in natural backgrounds. Rogowitz B., Allebach J. Human vision, visual processing and digital display IV, SPIE Proc. 2411:1995;355-362 SPIE, Bellingham, WA.
2. Blackwell H.R. Contrast thresholds of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 36:1946;624-643.
3. Cannon M.W. Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;1760-1768.
4. Cannon M.W., Fullenkamp S.C. A transducer model for contrast perception. Vision Research. 31:1991;983-998.
5. Daly S. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. Watson A.B. Digital images and human vision. 1993;179-206 MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
6. Georgeson M.A., Sullivan J.M. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. Journal of Physiology, London. 252:1975;627-656.
7. Graham N., Beck J., Sutter A. Nonlinear processes in spatial -frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: effects of sign and amount of contrast. Vision Research. 32:1992;719-743.
8. Graham N., Sutter A., Venkatesan C. Spatial-frequency and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation. Vision Research. 33:1993;1893-1911.
9. Legge G.E., Foley J.M. Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 70:1980;1458-1471.
10. Lubin J. The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance. Watson A.B. Digital images and human vision. 1993;163-178 MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
11. Lubin J. A visual discrimination model for imaging stystem design and evaluation. Peli E. Spatial vision models. 1995;245-283 World Scientific, New Jersey.
12. Sperling G., Solomon J.A., Lu Z., Chubb C. First and second-order processes in the perception of motion and texture. Zurada J.M., Marks II R.J., Robinson C.J. Computational intelligence: imitating life. 1994;223-236 IEEE Press, New York.
13. Sutter A., Graham N. Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed-accuracy tradeoff method. Vision Research. 35:1995;2825-2843.
14. Sutter A., Sperling G., Chubb C. Measuring the spatial selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms. Vision Research. 35:1995;915-924.
15. Watson A.B., Solomon J.A. Model of contrast gain contral in pattern masking. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14:1997;2379-2391.