Does daylength explain the latitudinal variation in clutch size of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca?

Ibis

Volumn 141, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 100-108

  Sanz, Juan José ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUTCH SIZE; DAY LENGTH; ENERGETICS; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; PASSERINE;

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA;

EID: 0032898505     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1999.tb04268.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Ståhlbrandt, K. 1982. Why do Pied Flycatcher females mate with already-mated males? Anim. Behav. 30: 585-593.
2. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Ulfstrand, S. 1985. Habitat selection in the Pied Flycatcher. In Cody, M (ed.) Habitat Selection in Birds: 59-63. New York: Academic Press.
3. Alatalo, R.V., Gottlander, K. & Lundberg, A. 1988. Conflict or cooperation between parents in feeding nestlings in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Omis Scand. 19: 31-34.
4. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Rätti, O. 1990. Male polyterritoriality and imperfect female choice in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav. Ecol. 1: 171-177.
5. Armstrong, E.A. 1954. The behaviour of birds in continuous daylight. Ibis 96: 1-30.
6. Askenmo, C.E.H. 1977. Effects of addition and removal of nestlings on nestling weight, nestling survival, and female weight loss in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Pallas). Ornis Scand. 8: 1-8.
7. Bergman, S. 1934. lakttagelser over den svart och vita flugsnapparens, Muscicapa atricapilla, upfödning av sina ungar. Fauna Flora 29: 161-166.
8. Boyce, M.S. 1979. Seasonality and patterns of natural selection for life histories. Am. Nat. 114: 569-583.
9. Bryant, D.M. & Tatner, P. 1988. The cost of brood provisioning: effects of brood size and food supply. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 19: 364-379.
10. Bussmann, J. 1933. Experiments with the terragraph on the activities of nestling birds. Bird Banding 4: 33-40.
11. Carrascal, L.M., Potti, J. & Sanchez-Aguado, F.J. 1987. Spatio-temporal organisation of the bird communities in two Mediterranean montane forests. Holarct. Ecol. 10: 185-192.
12. Charnov, E.L. & Krebs, J.R. 1974. On clutch-size and fitness. Ibis 116:217-219.
13. Cody, M.L. 1966. A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20: 174-184.
14. Cramp, S. & Perrins, C.M. 1993. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Curio, E. 1959. Verhaltenstudien am Trauerschnäpper. Z. Tierpsychol. Suppl. 3: 1-118.
16. Daan, S., Dijkstra, C. & Tinbergen, J.M. 1990. Family planning in the Kestrel, Falco tinnunculus: variations in optimal laying date and clutch size with food supply. Behaviour 114: 83-116.
17. Drent, R.H. & Daan, S. 1980. The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68: 225-252.
18. Glutz von Blotzheim, U.K. & Bauer, K. 1993. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 13/I. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.
19. Haartman, L. von. 1954. Der Trauerfliegenschnäpper. III. Die Nahrungsbiologie. Acta Zool. Fenn. 83: 1-96.
20. Hails, C.J. & Bryant, D.M. 1979. Reproductive energetics of a freeliving bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 471-482.
21. Hannila, J. & Järvinen, A. 1987. Feeding activity of hole-nesting passerines during the nestling period in northern Lapland. Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Litt. Gothob. Zool. 14: 102-108.
22. Hegendorf, G. 1912. Der Terragraph. Leipzig.
23. Hillström, L. & Olsson, K. 1994. Advantages of hatching synchrony in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J. Avian Biol. 25: 205-214.
24. Hillström, L. 1995. Body mass reduction during reproduction in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: physiological stress or adaptation for lowered costs of locomotion? Funct. Ecol. 9: 807-817.
25. Isenmann, P. & Moali, A. 1987. Clutch size reduction in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Omis Fenn. 64: 119.
26. Järvi, T. & Røskaft, E. 1991. Distribution of parental care by monogamous Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Fauna Norv. Ser. C., Cinclus 14: 23-28.
27. Järvinen, A. 1990. Incubation and nestling periods in hole-nesting passerines in Finnish Lapland. Ornis Fenn. 67: 65-72.
28. Järvinen, A. & Ylimaunu, J. 1986. Growth of nestling Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in northern Lapland. Ornis Fenn. 63: 17-25.
29. Karplus, M. 1952. Bird activity in the continuous daylight of arctic summer. Ecology 33: 129-134.
30. Klaarssen, M. & Drent, R. 1991. An analysis of hatching resting metabolism: in search of ecological correlates that explain derivations from allometric relations. Condor 93: 612-629.
31. Klomp, H. 1970. The determination of clutch size in birds. A review. Ardea 58: 1-124.
32. Lack, D. 1947. The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89: 302-352.
33. Lack, D. 1954. The Natural Regulation of Animal Populations. London: Oxford University Press.
34. Lennerstedt, I. 1969. Night rest and nest-visit frequency at five nests of Pied Flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca (Pall.), in Swedish Lapland. Ark. Zool. 22: 279-287.
35. Lennerstedt, I. 1987. Feeding rhythm in tree passerines under subarctic conditions in Lapland. Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Litt. Gothob. Zool. 14: 109-117.
36. Lifjeld, J.T. & Slagsvold, T. 1989. Allocation of parental investments by polygynous Pied Flycatcher males. Ornis Fenn. 66: 3-14.
37. Lifjeld, J.T. & Slagsvold, T. 1990. Manipulations of male parental investment in polygynous Pied Flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav. Ecol. 1: 48-54.
38. Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R.V. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. London: Poyser.
39. Mappes, T., Mappes, J. & Kotiaho, J. 1994. Ectoparasites, nest site choice and breeding success in the Pied Flycatcher. Oecologia 98: 147-149.
40. Masman, D., Daan, S. & Beldhuis, H.J.A. 1988. Ecological energetics of the kestrel: daily energy expenditure throughout the year based on time-energy budget, food intake and doubly labelled water methods. Ardea 76: 64-81.
41. Mertens, J.A.L. 1969. The influence of brood size on the energy metabolism and water loss of nestling Great Tits Parus major major. Ibis 111: 11-16.
42. Mertens, J.A.L. 1977. Thermal conditions for successful breeding in Great Tits (Paws major L.). Oecologia 28: 1-29.
43. Møller, A.P. 1984. Geographical trends in breeding parameters of Swallows Hirundo rustica and House Martins Delichon urbica. Ornis Scand. 15: 43-54.
44. Moreno, J., Cowie, R.J., Sanz, J.J. & Williams, R.S.R. 1995. Differential response by males and females to brood manipulations in the Pied Flycatcher: energy expenditure and nestling diet. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 721-732.
45. Nilsson, J.Å. & Svensson, M. 1993. Fledging in altricial birds: parental manipulations or sibling competition?. Anim. Behav. 46: 379-386.
46. Paatela, J.E. 1938. Beobachtungen über das Verhalten der Vögel in der Sommernacht. Ornis Fenn. 15: 65-69.
47. Palmgren, P. 1935. Über den Tagesrhytmus der Vögel im arktischem Sommer. Ornis Fenn. 12: 107-121.
48. Pasanen, S. 1977. Breeding biology of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in eastern Finland. Ornis Fenn. 54: 119-122.
49. Potti, J. & Tellería, J.L. 1984. Aspectos ornitogeogrâficos de los melojares (Quecus pyrenaica) Willd del sistema central. Stud. Oecolog. 5: 247-258.
50. Potti, J., Sanchez-Aguado, F.J., Blanco, D. & Montalvo, S. 1987. Breeding data for a population of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in Central Spain. Ardeola 34: 105-110.
51. Pulliainen, E. 1977. Habitat selection and breeding biology of boxnesting birds in northeastern Finnish Forest Lapland. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 17: 2-22.
52. Ricklefs, R.E. 1972. Latitudinal variation in breeding productivity of the Rough-winged Swallow. Auk 89: 826-836.
53. Ricklefs, R.E. 1980. Geographical variation in clutch size among passerine birds: Ashmole's hypothesis. Auk 97: 38-49.
54. Rivas Martïnez, S. 1981. Les étagles bioclimatiques de la végétation de la Peninsule Iberique. Actas III Congr Optima. An. Jard. Bot. Madrid 37: 251-268.
55. Royama, T. 1969. A model for the global variation of clutch size in birds. Oikos 20: 562-567.
56. Sætre, G.P., Fossness, T. & Slagssvold, T. 1995. Food provisioning in the Pied Flycatcher: do females gain direct benefits from choosing bright-coloured males?. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 21-30.
57. Sanz, J.J. 1995. Environmental restrictions on reproduction in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ardea 83: 421-430.
58. Sanz, J.J. 1997. Geographic variation in breeding parameters of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ibis 139: 107-114.
59. Siikamäki, P., Hovi, M. & Rätti, O. 1994. A trade-off between current reproduction and moult in the Pied Flycatcher - an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 8: 587-593.
60. Siikamäki, P. 1995. Habitat quality and reproductive traits in the Pied Flycatcher - an experiment. Ecology 76: 308-312.
61. Slagsvold, T. 1981. Clutch size and population stability in birds: a test of hypothesis. Oecologia 49: 213-217.
62. Slagsvold, T. 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia 54: 159-169.
63. Times 1974. The Times Atlas of the World, comprehensive edition. London: Times Newspapers Limited.
64. Tinbergen, J.M. & Dietz, M.W. 1994. Parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the Great Tit (Parus major) in relation to body mass, temperature, food availability and clutch size. Funct. Ecol. 8: 563-572.
65. Tinbergen, N. 1939. The behaviour of the snow bunting in spring. Trans. Linn. Soc. 5: 1-95.
66. Walter, H. & Lieth, H. 1967. Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas. Jena: G. Fischer.
67. Williams, G.C. 1966. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100: 687-690.