Using GIS to integrate information on forest recreation

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 12-16

  Wing, Michael ^a   Shelby, Bo ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST RECREATION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; LOGGING (FORESTRY); MANAGEMENT; MAPPING; RECREATIONAL FACILITIES; RESEARCH; SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL; SURVEYING;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GIS; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032895112     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BENNET, J. 1993. Dynamic segmentation model of an underground electric distribution network. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual ESRI User Conference. Palm Springs, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
2. BRUNSON, M., and B. SHELBY. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: How does New Forestry rate? Journal of Forestry 90(7):37-41.
3. COLE, D.N. 1989. Recreation ecology: What we know, what geographers can contribute. Professional Geographer 41(2):143-48.
4. CONFER, J.J., A.R. GRAEFE , and J.M. FALK. 1992. A geographic information systems approach to analysis of the spatial relationships between recreational boating uses and perceived impacts. In Proceedings of the 1992 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, 103-10. General Technical Report NE-176. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
5. DUEKER, K., and R. VRANA. 1992. Dynamic segmentation revisited: A milepoint linear data model. Journal of urban and Regional Information Systems Association 4(2):94-105.
6. FINLEY, M.T. 1990. McDonald Forest: A case study in the use of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum planning framework in a near-urban forest. Master's thesis, Oregon State University.
7. GIMBLETT, H.R., and R.M. ITAMI. 1997. Modeling the spatial dynamic and social interaction of human recreators using GIS and intelligent agents. In International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Hobart, Tasmania, December 8-11, 1997, 1,896-901. The Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia.
8. HULL, R.B. 1988. Forest visual quality management and research. In Outdoor recreation benchmark 1988: Proceedings of the National Outdoor Recreation Forum, 485-98. General Technical Report SE-52. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
9. MEIGHEN, E., and E. VOLGER. 1997. Spatial solutions to recreation use. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Hydropower, Atlanta, Georgia. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
10. OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY. 1993. OSU College Forest standards, guidelines, and monitoring plan. Document accompanying McDonald-Dunn Forest Plan. Revision March 29, 1993. Corvallis, OR: McDonald-Dunn Research Forest Planning Team, College of Forestry.
11. SHECHTER, M. and R.C. LUCAS. 1978. Simulation of recreational use for park and wilderness management. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
12. STANKEY, G.H., R.C. LUCAS, and D.W. LIME. 1976. Crowding in parks and wilderness. Design and Environment 7(3):38-41.
13. TORRES, T., S. INGRAHAM, and D. DEAGEN. 1996. Summary of 1996 McDonald-Dunn Forest's compatibility survey for research, teaching and demonstration. Unpublished report. Corvallis, OR: McDonald-Dunn Research Forest, College of Forestry, Oregon State University.
14. VINING, J., H.W. SCHROEDER, and T.C. DANIEL. 1984. Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research 16(2):124-35.
15. WATSON, A.E. 1990. Why is it important to monitor social conditions in wilderness? In Managing America's enduring wilderness resource: Proceedings of the Conference, September 11-17. Minneapolis: Tourism Center.
16. WING, M.G. 1998. Using a geographic information system (GIS) to monitor recreation impacts in a forest setting. PhD thesis, Oregon State University.
17. WING, M., and A. SKAUGSET. 1998. GIS casts a line: Examining salmon habitat in Oregon streams. Geo Info Systems 8(7):36-41.