A prospective follow up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 38-41

  Milne, D S ^a   Wadehra, V ^a   Mennim, D ^a   Wagstaff, T I ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSKARYOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0032892839     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08082.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Duncan, editor. Guidelines for Clinical Practice and Programme Management. NHS Cervical Screening Programme, March 1992.
2. Beeby AR, Keating PJ, Wagstaff TI, Wilson EMJ, Sims PF, Manning PJ, Wadehra V. The quality and accuracy of cervical cytology: a study of five sampling devices in a colposcopy clinic. J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 13: 276-281.
3. Herbert, RCPath, BSCC, NHSCSP Working Party. Achievable Standards, Benchmarks for Reporting & Criteria for Evaluating Cervical Cytopathology. NHSCSP. October 1995.
4. Information & Statistics Division, the National Health Service in Scotland. Cervical Cytology Statistics 1993. Edinburgh 1994.
5. Ashfaq R, Housini I, Saboorian MH. False positive cervical cytologic or sampling error Acta Cytolog 1995; 39: 988.
6. Nasiell K, Nasiell M, Vaklavinkova V. Behaviour of moderate cervical dysplasia during long term follow up. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 609-614.