On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 2127-2141

  Kingdom, Frederick A A ^a   Simmons, David R ^b   Rainville, Stéphane ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colour vision; Isoluminance; Random dot stereograms; Stereopsis; Surface perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 0032891591     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00257-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Comerford J.P. Stereopsis with chromatic contours. Vision Research. 14:1974;975-982.
2. Granger E.M., Hurtley J.C. Visual chromaticity-modulation transfer function. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 63:1973;1173-1174.
3. Gregory R.L. Vision with isoluminant colour contrast: 1. A projection technique and observations. Perception. 6:1977;113-119.
4. Hess, R. F., Kingdom, F. A. A. & Ziegler, L. R. (1997). On the relationship between the spatial channels for luminance and disparity processing. Vision Research, (in press).
5. Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. 1971;University of Chicago, Chicago.
6. Kingdom F.A.A., Simmons D.R. Stereoacuity and colour contrast. Vision Research. 36:1996;1311-1319.
7. Kingdom F.A.A., Whittle P. Contrast discrimination at high contrasts reveals the influence of local light adaptation on contrast processing. Vision Research. 36:1996;817-829.
8. Kingdom, F. A. A., Ziegler, L. R. & Hess, R. F. (1997). Spatial scale facilitates stereoscopic segmentation. Vision Research, (submitted).
9. Kovács I., Fehér A. Non-Fourier information in bandpass noise patterns. Vision Research. 37:1997;1167-1175.
10. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 49:1971;467-477.
11. Livingstone M.S. Differences between stereopsis, interocular correlation, and binocularity. Vision Research. 36:1996;1127-1140.
12. Livingstone M.S., Hubel D.H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience. 7:1987;3416-3468.
13. Lu C., Fender D.H. The interaction of color and luminance in stereoscopic vision. Investigative Ophthalmology. 11:1972;482-489.
14. Marr D., Poggio T. Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science. 194:1976;283-287.
15. Mayhew J.E.W., Frisby J.P. The computation of binocular edges. Perception. 9:1980;69-86.
16. Nelson J.I. Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 49:1975;1-88.
17. Mullen K.T. The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow gratings. Journal of Physiology. 359:1985;381-409.
18. Mullen K.T. Color vision as a post-receptoral specialization of the central visual field. Vision Research. 31:1991;119-130.
19. Mullen K.T., Kingdom F.A.A. Losses in peripheral colour sensitivity predicted from hit and miss post-receptoral connections. Vision Research. 36:1996;1995-2000.
20. Rogers B.J., Graham M.E. Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science. 221:1983;1409-1411.
21. Rogers B.J., Howard I.P. Binocular vision and stereopsis. 1995;Oxford University, New York.
22. Scharff L.V., Geisler W.S. Stereopsis at isoluminance in the absence of chromatic aberrations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 9:1992;868-876.
23. Simmons D.R., Kingdom F.A.A. Contrast thresholds for stereoscopic depth discrimination with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli. Vision Research. 34:1994;2971-2982.
24. Simmons D.T., Kingdom F.A.A. Differences between stereopsis with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 12:1995;2094-2104.
25. Simmons D.T., Kingdom F.A.A. On the independence of chromatic and achromatic stereopsis mechanisms. Vision Research. 37:1997;1271-1280.
26. Simmons D.T., Kingdom F.A.A. On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast. Vision Research. 38:1998;1063-1071.
27. Smallman H.S., MacLeod D.I.A. A size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11:1994;2169-2183.
28. de Weert C.M.M. Colour contours and stereopsis. Vision Research. 19:1979;555-564.
29. de Weert C.M.M., Sazda K.J. New data concerning the contribution of colour differences to stereopsis. Mollon J.D., Sharpe L.T. Colour vision. Physiology and psychophysics. 1983;553-562 Academic, London.
30. Wilcox L.M., Hess R.F. Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? Vision Research. 36:1996;391-399.
31. Ziegler, L. R. & Hess, R. F. (1998). Stereoscopic depth but not shape from second-order stimuli. Vision Research (in press).