Bivariate analysis of surgically induced regular astigmatism. Mathematical analysis and graphical display

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 50-61

  Naeser, K ^a   Hjortdal, J Ø ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; EYE SURGERY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032890307     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1999.00404.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Armitage, P. and Berry, G. 1987. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
2. Bennett A. G. A new approach to the statistical analysis of ocular astigmatism and astigmatic prescriptions. The Frontiers of Optometry: First International Congress. 2:1984;35-42.
3. Bennett, A. G. and Rabbetts, R. R. 1989. Clinical Visual Optics. 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, London. p. 105-106.
4. Blackie C. A., Harris W. F. Refraction and keratometry: Departures from and transformation towards multivariate normality. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;452-458.
5. Deal F. C., Toop J. Recommended coordinate systems for thin spherocylindrical lenses. Optom. Vis. Sci. 70:1993;409-413.
6. Gartner W. F. Astigmatism and optometric vectors. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 42:1965;459-463.
7. Hald, A. (1952). Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications, Wiley International edn, Wiley, New York, pp. 585-623.
8. Harris W. F. Algebra of spherocylinders and refractive errors and their means, variance and standard deviation. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65:1988;795-802.
9. Harris W. F. Direct, vec and other squares, and sample variance-covariance of dioptric power. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 10:1990;72-80.
10. Harris W. F. The mean and variances of samples of dioptric powers: the basic calculations. Clin. Exp. Optom. 73:1990;89-92.
11. Harris W. F. Statistical inference on mean dioptric power: hypothesis testing and confidence regions. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. 10:1990;363-372.
12. Harris W. F. Representation of dioptric power in Euclidian 3-space. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 11:1991;130-136.
13. Harris W. F., Malan D. J., Rubin A. Ellipsoidal confidence regions for mean refractive status. Optom. Vis. Sci. 68:1991;950-953.
14. Harris W. F. Dioptric power: Its representation in three- and four-dimensional space. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;349-366.
15. Harris W. F. Invariance of ophthalmic properties under spherocylinder transposition. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;459-462.
16. Hjortdal J. Ø, Erdman L., Bek T. Fourier analysis of video-keratographic data. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 15:1995;171-185.
17. Holladay J. T., Cravy T. V., Koch D. D. Calculating the surgically induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 18:1992;429-443.
18. Hotelling H. The generalisation of Student's ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 2:1931;360-378.
19. Jaffe N. S., Clayman H. M. The pathophysiology of corneal astigmatism after cataract extraction. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 79:1975;615-630.
20. Keating M. P. On the use of matrices for the mean value of refractive errors. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 3:1983;201-203.
21. Keating M. P. Equivalent dioptric power asymmetry relations for thick astigmatic systems. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;388-392.
22. Long W. F. A matrix formalism for decentration problems. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53:1976;27-33.
23. McKendrick A. M., Brennan N. A. Distribution of astigmatism in the adult population. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 13:(2):1996;206-214.
24. Naeser K., Boberg-Ans J., Bargum R. Prediction of anterior corneal curvature following extracapular cataract surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 14:1988;459-460.
25. Naeser K. Conversion of keratometer readings to polar values. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 16:1990;741-745.
26. Naeser, K. and Naeser, E. V. (1994). Astigmeter, version 1.0. A software program for description and statistical analysis of surgically induced astigmatism. In: Program and Manual, Violvej 20, 8240 Risskov, Denmark.
27. Naeser K., Behrens J. K., Naeser E. V. Quantitative assessment of corneal astigmatic surgery: expanding the polar values concept. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 20:1994;162-168.
28. Naeser K., Behrens J. K. Correlation between polar values and vector analysis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 23:1997;76-81.
29. Naeser K. Assessment of surgically induced astigmatism; Call for an international standard. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 23:1997;1278-1280.
30. Raasch T. Clinical refraction in three-dimensional dioptric space revisited. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;376-380.
31. Rubin A., Harris W. F. Refractive variation during autorefraction: multivariate distribution of refractive status. Optop. Vis. Sci. 72:1995;403-410.
32. Rabbets R. B. Scalar representation of astigmatism. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;257-260.
33. Saunders H. A method for determining the mean value of refractive errors. Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 34:1980;1-11.
34. Saunders H. Author's reply. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 2:1982;88-91.
35. Saunders (1985).
36. Thibos, L. N., Wheeler, W. and Horner, D. (1994). A vector method for the analysis of astigmatic refractive errors. In: Vision Science and its Applications, Vol. 2, Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, pp. 14-17.
37. Thibos L. N., Wheeler W., Horner P. G. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;367-375.
38. Yager, A. S. (1982). The mean value of refractive errors. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 2, 87-88.