Haemodynamic changes in non-alcoholic (viral) liver cirrhosis studied by computed tomography (CT) arterial portography and CT arteriography

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 908-914

  Takayasu, Kenichi ^a   Yoshie, Kouichi ^a   Muramatsu, Yukio ^a   Iwata, Ryoko ^a   Nakanishi, Yukihiro ^b   Sakamoto, Michiie ^b   Fukuda, Haruhiko ^b   Satake, Mitsuo ^c   Moriyama, Noriyuki ^c   Makino, Yasuhiro ^d  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL EAST   (Japan)

^d IWAKUNI NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography arterial portography; Computed tomography arteriography; Haemodynamic changes; Inhomogeneous enhancement; Non alcoholic cirrhosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER ARTERIOGRAPHY; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MALE; PORTAL PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032887071     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.1999.01957.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1 Matsui O, Kadoya M, Suzuki M et al. Dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 1983;146:721-7.
2. 2 Heiken JP, Weyman PJ, Lee JKT et al. Detection of focal hepatic masses: Prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 47-51.
3. 3 Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bernardino ME. Hepatic tumors: Comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for prospective evaluation. Radiology 1989; 172: 27-34.
4. 4 Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Muramatsu Y et al. The diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy of various imaging procedures in 100 patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990; 155:49-54.
5. 5 Prando A, Wallace S, Bernardino MR, Lindell Jr MM. Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver. Radiology 1979; 130: 697-701.
6. 6 Moss AA, Dean PB, Axel L et al. Dynamic CT of hepatic masses with intravenous and intraarterial contrast material. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1982; 138: 847-52.
7. 7 Freeny PC, Marks W. Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver. Radiology 1983; 148: 193-7.
8. 8 Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Furukawa H et al. Early hepatocellular carcinoma: Appearance at CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 194: 101-5.
9. 9 Winter III TC, Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y et al. Early advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Evaluation of CT and MR appearance with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 192: 379-87.
10. 10 Chezmar JL, Bernardino ME, Kaufman SH, Nelson RC. Combined CT arterial portography and CT hepatic angiography for evaluation of the hepatic resection candidate. Radiology 1993; 189: 407-10.
11. 11 Irie T, Takeshita K, Wada Y et al. CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: Comparison of CT with arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous use of both techniques. AJR Am. J. Roentgentol. 1995; 164: 1407-12.
12. 12 Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y. Early stage of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: Adenomatous hyperplasia and early hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 1991; 22: 172-8.
13. 13 Armitage P, Berry G. Further Analysis of Categorical Data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
14. 14 Lelio DA, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L. Cirrhosis: Diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface. Radiology 1989; 172: 389-92.
15. 15 Torres WE, Whitmire LF, Gegauda-McClees K, Bernardino ME. Computed tomography of hepatic morphologic changes in cirrhosis of the liver. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1986; 10: 47-50.
16. 16 Harbin WP, Robert NJ, Ferrucci Jr JT. Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in hepatic morphology. Radiology 1980; 135: 273-83.
17. 17 Kimura T, Ebara M, Nihei T et al. Classification of liver cirrhosis based on hypoechoic nodules of parenchyma and its clinical usefulness in diagnosis of cirrhotic liver. Jpn. J. Med. Ultrasonics 1988; 15: 325-33 (in Japanese).
18. 18 Itai Y, Ohnishi S, Ohtomo K et al. Regenerating nodules of liver cirrhosis: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 165:419-23.
19. 19 Sumida M, Ohto M, Ebara M, Kimura K, Okuda K, Hirooka N. Accuracy of angiography in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am. J. Roentegenol. 1986; 147: 531-6.
20. 20 Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Hirohashi S et al. Malignant transformation of adenomatous hyperplasia to hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 1990; 336: 1150-3.
21. 21 Rappaport AM, MacPhee PJ, Fisher MM, Phillips MJ. The scarring of the liver acini (cirrhosis): Tridimensional and microcirculatory considerations. Virchows Arch. Pathol. Anat. 1983; 402: 107-37.
22. 22 Yamamoto T, Kobayashi T, Philips MJ. Perinodular arteriolar plexus in liver cirrhosis. Scanning electron microscopy of microvascular casts. Liver 1984; 4: 50-4.
23. 23 Conn HO, Atterbury CE. Cirrhosis. In: Schiff L, Schiff ER, eds. Diseases of the Liver 7th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993; 875-934.
24. 24 Shimamatsu K, Kage M, Nakashima O, Kojiro M. Pathomorphological study of HCV antibody-positive liver cirrhosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1994; 9: 624-30.