Misdiagnosis of Munchausen syndrome by proxy: A literature review and four new cases

Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 94-101

  Rand, Deirdre C ^a   Feldman, Marc D ^b,c  

^a Marin Psychological Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD ABUSE; CHILD CARE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY;

EID: 0032886289     PISSN: 10673229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hrp/7.2.94     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Money J, Werlwas J. Folie à deux in the parents of psychosocial dwarfs: two cases. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1976; 4:351-62.
2. Meadow R. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: the hinterland of child abuse. Lancet 1977;2:343-5.
3. Rosenberg DA. Web of deceit: a literature review of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Child Abuse Negl 1987;11: 547-63.
4. Southall DP, Plunkett MCB, Banks MW, Falkov AF, Samuels MP. Covert video recordings of life-threatening child abuse: lessons for child protection. Pediatrics 1997;100:735-60.
5. Libow JA, Schreier HA. Three forms of factitious illness in children: when is it Munchausen syndrome by proxy? Am J Orthopsychiatry 1986;56:602-10.
6. Godding V, Kruth M. Compliance with treatment in asthma and Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child 1991; 66:956-60.
7. Meadow R. What is, and what is not, 'Munchausen syndrome by proxy'? Arch Dis Child 1995;72:534-8.
8. Fisher GC, Mitchell I. Is Munchausen syndrome by proxy really a syndrome? Arch Dis Child 1995;72:530-4.
9. Morley CJ. Practical concerns about the diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child 1995;72:528-9.
10. Milner AD. Commentary: practical concerns about the diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child 1995; 72:529-30.
11. Artingstall KA. Munchausen syndrome by proxy. FBI Law Enforcement Bull, August 1995:5-11.
12. McClure RJ, Davis PM, Meadow SR, Sibert JR. Epidemiology of Munchausen syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:57-61.
13. Davis P, McClure RJ, Rolfe K, Chessman N, Pearson S, Sibert JR, et al. Procedures, placement, and risks of further abuse after Munchausen syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation. Arch Dis Child 1998;78: 217-21.
14. Schreier HA, Libow JA. Hurting for love: Munchausen by proxy syndrome. New York: Guilford, 1993.
15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
16. Ford CV. Ethical and legal issues in factitious disorders: an overview. In: Feldman MD, Eisendrath SJ, eds. The spectrum of factitious disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1996:51-63.
17. Sigal M, Gelkopf M, Levertof G. Medical and legal aspects of the Munchausen by proxy perpetrator. Med Law 1990;9: 739-49.
18. Meadow R. Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child 1982;57:92-8.
19. Feldman MD, Ford CV. Patient or pretender: inside the strange world of factitious disorders. New York: Wiley, 1994.
20. Chin P, Breu G. The murder that never was. People Weekly 1991;36(23):111-6.
21. Pankratz L. Factitious disorders and factitious disorders by proxy. In: Netherton S, Holmes D, Walker CE, eds. Child and adolescent psychological disorders: a comprehensive textbook. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999:304-19.
22. Bools CN, Neale BA, Meadow SR. Co-morbidity associated with fabricated illness (Munchausen syndrome by proxy). Arch Dis Child 1992;67:77-9.
23. Feldman MD, Allen DB. "False-positive" factitious disorder by proxy [Letter]. South Med J 1996;89:452-3.
24. Melvin D. Misdiagnosis by doctor nearly tore family apart: son's enzyme disorder was confused with poisoning. Huntsville Times, 18 July 1993:A11.
25. Pankratz L. Patients who deceive: assessment and management of risk in providing health care and financial benefits. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas, 1998.
26. Thomason v SCAN et al, 85 F3d 1365 (8th Cir 1996).
27. Krener P, Adelman R. Parent salvage and parent sabotage in the care of chronically ill children. Am J Dis Child 1988;142: 945-51.
28. Meadow R. Foreword. In: Schreier HA, Libow JA. Hurting for love: Munchausen by proxy syndrome. New York: Guilford, 1993:vii-x.
29. Ostfeld BM, Feldman MD. Factitious disorder by proxy: clinical features, detection, and management. In: Feldman MD, Eisendrath SJ, eds. The spectrum of factitious disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1996:83-108.
30. Rosenberg D. From lying to homicide: the spectrum of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. In: Levin AV, Sheridan MS, eds. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: issues in diagnosis and treatment. New York: Lexington, 1995:13-37.
31. Zitelli BJ, Seltman MF, Shannon RM. Munchausen's syndrome by proxy and its professional participants. Am J Dis Child 1987;141:1099-102.
32. Rand DC. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: a complex type of emotional abuse responsible for some false allegations of child abuse in divorce. Issues Child Abuse Accusations 1993;5: 135-55.
33. Artingstall K. Practical aspects of Munchausen by proxy and Munchausen syndrome investigations. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC, 1998.
34. Appelbaum PS. Child abuse reporting laws: time for reform? Psychiatr Serv 1999;50:27-9.