Reliability of the COOP/WONCA charts. Test-retest completed by patients presenting psychosocial health problems to their general practitioner

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 145-148

  Lindegaard, Peter M ^a,b   Bentzen, Niels ^a   Christiansen, Terkel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

COOP WONCA charts; General practice; Health outcome; Health status; Primary health care; Psychosocial health problems; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DENMARK; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOSOCIAL DISORDER; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0032883410     PISSN: 02813432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028134399750002548     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Nelson EC, Wasson J, Kirk J, Keller A, Clark D, Dietrich A, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987;40(S1):55S-63S.
2. Scholten JHG, van Weel C. Functional status assessment in family practice. The Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts/WONCA. Lelystad: MEDI Tekst, 1992.
3. Nelson EC, Landgraf RD, Hays RD, Kirk JW, Wasson JH, Keller A, et al. The COOP function charts: a system to measure patient function in physicians' offices. In: Lipkin M, Jr., editor. Functional status measurement in primary care. New York: Springer, 1990:97-131.
4. Meyboom-de Jong B, Smith RJA. Studies of the Dartmouth COOP function charts in general practice: comparison with the Nottingham Health Profile and the General Health Questionnaire. In: Lipkin M, Jr., editor. Functional status measurement in primary care. New York: Springer, 1990:132-49.
5. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Rachel Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short-and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992;30(Suppl 5):MS253-65.
6. Wasson J, Keller A, Rubinstein L, Hays R, Nelson E, Johnson D, et al. Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings: the clinician's point of view. Med Care 1992;30(Suppl 5):MS42-49.
7. Schuling J, Meyboom-de Jong B. Change in clinical status in patients with stroke. In: Scholten JHG, van Weel C, editors. Functional status assessment in family practice. The Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts/WONCA. Lelystad: MEDI Tekst, 1992:73-4.
8. Pedersen JK. Depression i almen praksis. Vurdering af diagnostiske tests og beskrivelse af forekomst og sværhedsgrad af depressiv enkelt-episode i en dansktalende praksispopulation (Depression in general practice. Evaluation of diagnostic tests and description of prevalence and severity of depressive episode in a Danish-speaking general practice population) English summary. Odense, Denmark: University of Odense, 1996.
9. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993;2:369-95.
10. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, König-Zahn C. Cross cultural health outcome assessment; a user's guide. Ruinen, The Netherlands: ERGHO, 1997.
11. Lindegaard P. Samtalebehandling i almen praksis (Talking treatments in primary care) English summary. Projektrapport til Fyns Amt. University of Odense, Denmark, 1992.
12. Balint E. Talking treatments. In: Priest RG, editor. Psychiatry in medical practice. Plymouth: MacDonald & Evans, 1982:75-92.
13. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
14. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
15. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981.