Global aphasia: An innovative assessment approach

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 80, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1309-1315

  Connolly, John F ^a   Mate Kole, C Charles ^b   Joyce, Brenda M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CASE REPORT; EVOKED RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0032881961     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90035-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
2. Joyce B, Rockwood K, Mate-Kole C. Use of goal attainment scaling in brain injury in a rehabilitation hospital. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:10-4.
3. Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines (MN): American Guidance Service; 1981.
4. Kaplan E, Fein D, Morris R, Delis DC. The WAIS-R as a Neuropsychological Instrument. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1991.
5. Morse PA, Montgomery CE. Neuropsychologial evaluation of traumatic brain injury. In: White RF, editor. Clinical syndromes in adult neuropsychology: the practitioner's handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 86-176.
6. Whitman S, Coonley-Hoganson W, Desai B. Comparative head trauma in two socioeconomically different Chicago-area communities: a population study. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:570-80.
7. Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated defects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:11-6.
8. Enderby P, Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Aphasia after stroke: a detailed study of recovery in the first 3 months. Int Rehabil Med 1987;8:162-5.
9. Marquardsen J. The natural history of acute cerebrovascular disease. A retrospective study of 769 patients. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1969;38:67-8.
10. Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama G, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995;38:659-66.
11. Enderby P, Philipp R. Speech and language handicap: towards knowing the size of the problem. Br J Disord Communication 1987;21:151-65.
12. Picton TW, Lins OG, Scherg M. The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology. Vol 10. Toronto: Elsevier Science; 1995. p. 3-73.
13. Polich J. Cognitive brain potentials. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 1993;2:175-9.
14. Chiappa KH. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Raven; 1997.
15. Ingles JL, Mate-Kole CC, Connolly JF. Intact spontaneous speech production in a case of fluent aphasia: evidence for multiple output routes. Cortex 1996;32:199-219.
16. Byrne JM, Dywan C, Connolly JF. An innovative method to assess the receptive vocabulary of children with cerebral palsy using event-related brain potentials. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995;17:9-19.
17. Connolly JF, Byrne JM, Dywan CA. Event-related brain potentials reflect the receptive vocabulary of individuals as measured by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: a study of cross-modal and cross-form priming. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995;17:548-65.
18. Kutas M, Van Petten C. Event-related potential studies of language. In: Ackles PK, Jennings JR, Coles MGH, editors. Advances in psychophysiology. Greenwich (CT): JAI Press; 1988. p. 139-87.
19. Connolly JF, Phillips NA. Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. J Cogn Neurosci 1994;6:256-66.
20. Connolly JF, Stewart SH, Phillips NA. Neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences differing in contextual constraint and processing requirements. Brain Lang 1990;39:302-18.
21. Connolly JF, Phillips NA, Stewart SH, Brake W. Perception of degraded speech stimuli: ERPs suggest differential sensitivity to acoustic and contextual cues. Brain Lang 1992;43:1-18.
22. Connolly JF, Phillips NA, Forbes KAK. The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;94:276-87.
23. Helenius P, Salmelin R, Service E, Connolly J. Distinct stages of word and sentence comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain 1998;121:1133-42.
24. Anderson JE, Holcomb PJ. Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: an event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology 1995;32:177-90.
25. Swaab T, Brown C, Hagoort P. Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. J Cogn Neurosci 1997;9:39-66.
26. Osterhout L, McKinnon R, Bersick M, Corey V. On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family. J Cogn Neurosci 1997;8:507-26.
27. Näätänen, R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995;16:6-18.
28. Rugg MD. Event-related potential studies of human memory. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1995. p. 789-801.
29. Mate-Kole CC, Major A, Lenzer I, Connolly JF. The initial validation of the Quick Cognitive Screening Test (QCST). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:867-75.
30. Nelson HE. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe deficits. Cortex 1982;12:313-24.
31. Warrington E. Recognition Memory Test. Berkshire; NFER-NELSON; 1984.
32. Benton AL, Hamsher KD, Varney NR, Spreen O. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1983.
33. Kimura D. Neuropsychology test procedures. London (Ontario): DK Consultants; 1986.
34. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia (PA): Lea and Febiger; 1972.
35. McFie J. Assessment of organic intellectual impairment. London: Academic Press; 1975.
36. McFie J, Piercy M. The relation of laterality of lesion to performance on the Weigl Sorting Test. J Ment Sci 1952;98:299-303.
37. De Renzi E, Vignolo L. The Token Test. A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 1962;85:665-78.
38. Coltheart M. Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In: Posner MI, Marin OSM, editors. Attention and performance, (vol. 11). Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1985. p. 3-38.
39. Patterson K. The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological investigations. In: Ellis AW, editor. Normality and pathology in cognitive function. London: Academic Press; 1982. p. 77-111.
40. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
41. Besson M, Kutas M, Van Petten C. An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. J Cogn Neurosci 1992;4:132-49.
42. Michell PF, Andrews S, Ward PB. An event-related potential study of semantic congruity and repetition in a sentence-reading task: effects of context change. Psychophysiology 1993;30:496-509.
43. Byrne JM, Dywan C, Connolly JF. Assessment of children's receptive vocabulary using brain event-related potentials: development of a clinically valid test. Child Neuropsychol 1995;1:211-23.
44. Johnson R Jr. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 1986;33:367-84.
45. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1991.
46. Matarazzo JD. Psychological testing and assessment in the 21st century. Am Psychol 1991;47:1007-18.
47. Connolly JF, D'Arcy RCN. Innovations in neuropsychological assessment using event-related brain potentials. Int J Psychophysiol. Forthcoming.