Differential sensitivity of the caudal and rostral nucleus accumbens to the rewarding effects of a H1-histaminergic receptor blocker as measured with place-preference and self-stimulation behavior

Neuroscience

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 93-103

  Zimmermann, P ^a   Privou, C ^a   Huston, J P ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Caudal and rostral nucleus accumbens; Histamine; Intracranial self stimulation; Place preference; Rats; Reward

Indexed keywords

CHLORPHENIRAMINE; HISTAMINE H1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTAMINE RELEASE; HISTOLOGY; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REARING; RECEPTOR BLOCKING; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHLORPHENIRAMINE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HISTAMINE; HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RECEPTORS, HISTAMINE H1; REWARD; SELF STIMULATION;

EID: 0032880719     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00309-7     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agars K., Kokkinidis L. Scopolamine increases nonreinforced behavior in an intracranial self-stimulation discrimination paradigm. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 43:1992;657.
2. Airaksinen M.S., Alanen S., Szabat E., Visser T.J., Panula P. Multiple neurotransmitters in the tuberomammillary nucleus: comparison of rat, mouse, and guinea pig. J. comp. Neurol. 323:1992;103.
3. Allin R., Russell V., Lamm M., Taljaard J. Regional distribution of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens of the rat. Brain Res. 501:1989;389.
4. Alvarez X.A., Franco L., Fernandez-Novoa L., Cacabelos R. Effects of betahistidine on locomotor activity and passive avoidance behavior in rats. Agents Actions. 38:1993;C263.
5. Anisman H., Kokkinidis L. Effects of scopolamine, D-amphetamine and other drugs affecting catecholamines on spontaneous alternation and locomotor activity in mice. Psychopharmacologia. 45:1975;55.
6. Beardsley P.M., Balster R.C. The intravenous self-administration of antihistamines by rhesus monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 30:1992;117.
7. 1-antagonists. Fedn Proc. 43:1984;1036.
8. 1-antagonists in squirrel monkey. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 239:1986;104.
9. Bergman J., Spealman R.D. Behavioral effects of histamine H1 antagonists: comparision with other drugs and modification by haloperidol. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 245:1988;471.
10. Brog J.S., Salyapongse A., Deutch A.Y., Zahm D.S. The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and the shell in the "accumbens" part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J. comp. Neurol. 338:1993;255.
11. Buscher W., Schugens M., Wagner U., Huston J.P. Interhemispheric relationship between lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and the region of the nucleus tegmenti pedunculo-pontinus. Brain Res. 487:1989;321.
12. Carr G. D., Fibiger H. C. and Phillips A. G. (1989) Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In The Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward (eds Liebman J. M. and Cooper S. J.), pp. 264-319. Clarendon, Oxford.
13. Chronister R.B., Palmer G.C., DeFrance J.F., Sikes R.W., Hubbard J.I. Histamine: correlative studies in nucleus accumbens. J. Neurobiol. 13:1982;23.
14. Dringenberg H.C., De Souza Silva M.A., Huston J.P., Schwarting R.K.W. Histaminergic-cholinergic and histaminergic-dopaminergic interactions in urethane-anesthetized rats: evidence from in vivo microdialysis studies. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 23:1997;215.
15. Druhan J.P., Fibiger H.C., Phillips A.G. Differential effects of cholinergic drugs on discriminative cues and self-stimulation produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area. Psychopharmacology. 97:1989;331.
16. Evans S.M., Zacny J.P., Woolverton W.L., Johanson C.E. The discriminative stimulus effects of histamine H1-antagonists in pigeons. Behav. Pharmac. 2:1991;447.
17. Fibiger H.C., Carter D.A., Phillips A.G. Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward. Psychopharmacology. 47:1976;21.
18. Frisch C., Hasenöhrl R.U., Haas H.L., Weiler H.T., Steinbusch H.W.M., Huston J.P. Facilitation of learning after lesions of the tuberomammillary nucleus region in adult and aged rats. Expl Brain Res. 118:1998;447.
19. Greenshaw A. J. (1985) Electrical and chemical stimulation of brain tissue in vivo. In Neuromethods. (eds Boulton A. A. and Baker G. B.), pp. 233-277. Humana, Clifton.
20. Hasenöhrl R.U., Oitzl M.-S., Huston J.P. Conditioned place preference in the corral: a procedure for measuring reinforcing properties of drugs. J. Neurosci. Meth. 301:1989;141.
21. Hodos W., Valenstein E.S. An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:1962;80.
22. Huston J. P. and Hasenöhrl R. U. (1998) Evidence for an inhibitory role of neural histamine and of the tuberomammillary nucleus in the control of learning and reward processes. In Neurobiology of Histamine (ed. Prell G. D.), Humana, Totowa. (in press).
23. Huston J.P., Wagner U., Hasenöhrl R.U. The tuberomammillary nucleus projections in the control of learning, memory and reinforcement processes: evidence for an inhibitory role. Behav. Brain Res. 83:1997;97.
24. Inagaki N., Yamatodani A., Ando-Yamamoto M., Tohyama M., Watanabe T., Wada H. Organization of histaminergic fibers in the rat brain. J. comp. Neurol. 273:1988;283.
25. Johnson P.I., Goodman J.B., Condon R., Stellar J.R. Reward shifts and motor responses following microinjections of opiate-specific agonists into either the core or shell of the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology. 120:1995;195.
26. Jongen-Relo A.L., Voorn P., Groenewegen H.J. Immunohistochemical characterization of the shell and the core territories of the nucleus accumbens in the rat. Eur. J. Neurosci. 6:1994;1255.
27. Krauth J. (1988) Distribution-Free Statistics: An Application-Oriented Approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
28. Kubo N., Shirakawa O., Kuno T., Tanaka C. Antimuscarinic effects of antihistamines: quantitative evaluation by receptor-binding assay. Jap. J. Pharmac. 43:1987;277.
29. Lange W.R., Jasinski D.R. The clinical pharmacology of pentazocine and tripelennamine (T's and blues). Problems of drug dependence. Adv. Alcohol Subst. Abuse. 5:1984;71.
30. Liebman J.M. Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 7:1983;45.
31. Maldonado-Irizarry C.S., Kelley A.E. Excitotoxic lesions of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens differentially disrupt body weight regulation and motor activity in rat. Brain Res. Bull. 38:1995;551.
32. Masukawa Y., Suzuki T., Misawa M. Differential modification of the rewarding effects of methamphetamine and cocaine by opioids and antihistamines. Psychopharmacology. 111:1993;139.
33. Mattioli R., Nelson C.A., Huston J.P., Spieler R. Conditioned place-preference analysis in the goldfish with the H1 histamine antagonist chlorpheniramine. Brain Res. Bull. 45:1997;41.
34. 1-antagonists on operant behavior in the squirrel monkey. Psychopharmacology. 77:1982;156.
35. Milner P.M. Brain stimulation reward: a review. Can. J. Psychol. 45:1991;1.
36. Niigawa H., Yamatodani A., Nishimura T., Wada H., Cacabelos R. Effect of neurotoxic lesions in the mammillary bodies on the distribution of brain histamine. Brain Res. 459:1988;183.
37. O'Driscoll W.G., Lindley G.R. Self-administration of tripelennamine by a narcotic addict. New Engl. J. Med. 257:1957;376.
38. Onodera K. Muricidal suppression by chlorpheniramine and changes in brain levels following dietary-induced thiamine deficit in rats. Physiol. Behav. 41:1987;71.
39. Onodera K., Yamatodani A., Watanabe T. Effects of α-fuoromethylhistidine on locomotor activity, brain histamine and catecholamine contents in rats. Meth, Find. exp. clin. Pharmac. 14:1992;97.
40. Panula P., Airaksinen M.S., Pirvola U., Kotilainen E. A histamine-containing neuronal system in human brain. Neuroscience. 34:1990;127.
41. Panula P., Pirvola U., Auvinen S., Airaksinen M.S. Histamine-immunoreactive fibers in the rat brain. Neuroscience. 28:1989;585.
42. Paxinos G. and Watson C. (1986) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Academic, Sydney.
43. 3 receptors in rat brain areas. Neuroscience. 52:1993;169.
44. Privou C., Knoche A., Hasenöhrl R.U., Huston J.P. H1 and H2 histaminergic antagonists applied to the nucleus basalis magnocellularis region modulate anxiety and reinforcement related processes. Neuropharmacology. 37:1998;1019.
45. Robbins T.W., Cador M., Taylor J.R., Everitt B.J. Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 13:1989;155.
46. Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. Neurobehavioral mechanisms of reward and motivation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6:1996;228.
47. 125I] probes. In New Perspectives in Histamine Research, pp. 123-144. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
48. v mice. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 46:1993;95.
49. 1-receptor in the rat ventromedial hypothalamus and feeding elicitation. Brain Res. 441:1988;403.
50. Salamone J.D. The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation. Behav. Brain Res. 61:1994;117.
51. Shannon H.E., Su T.P. Effects of the combination of tripelennamine and pentazocine at the behavioral and molecular levels. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 17:1982;789.
52. Shishido S., Oishi R., Saeki K. In vivo effects of some histamine H1-receptor antagonists on monoamine metabolism in the mouse brain. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmac. 343:1991;185.
53. Showalter C.V. T's and blues: abuse of pentazocine and tripelennamine. J. Am. med. Assoc. 244:1980;1224.
54. Spyraki C. (1988) Drug reward studies. In The Psychopharmacology of Addiction (ed. Lader M.), pp. 97-114. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
55. Suzuki T., Masukawa Y., Misawa M. Drug interactions in the reinforcing effects of over-the-counter cough syrups. Psychopharmacology. 102:1990;438.
56. Suzuki T., Masukawa Y., Shiozaki Y., Misawa M. Potentiation of pentazocine conditioned place preference by tripelennamine in rats. Psychopharmacology. 105:1991;9.
57. 1-antagonists on discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine in rats. Behav. Pharmac. 7:1996;111.
58. Suzuki T., Takamori K., Misawa M., Onodera K. Effects of the histaminergic sytem on the morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice. Brain Res. 675:1995;195.
59. Tuomisto J., Tuomisto L. Effects of histamine and histamine antagonists on the uptake and release of catecholamines and 5-HT in brain synaptosomes. Med. Biol. 58:1980;33.
60. Unterwald E.M., Kornetsky C. Effects of concomitant pentazocine and tripelennamine on brain-stimulation reward. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 21:1984;961.
61. Unterwald E.M., Kucharsky L.T., Williams J.E.G., Kornetsky C. Tripelennamine: enhancement of brain-stimulation reward. Life Sci. 34:1984;149.
62. Wagner U., Goldenberg R., Huston J.P. A computerized system for monitoring and controlling intracranial electrical self-stimulation behavior. Behav. Res. Meth., Instr. Comput. 22:1990;499.
63. Wagner U., Segura-Torres P., Weiler H.T., Huston J.P. The tuberomammillary nucleus region as a reinforcement inhibiting substrate: facilitation of ipsihypothalamic self-stimulation by unilateral ibotenic acid lesions. Brain Res. 613:1993;269.
64. Wagner U., Weiler H.T., Huston J.P. Amplification of rewarding hypothalamic stimulation following a unilateral lesion in the region of the tuberomammillary nucleus. Neuroscience. 52:1993;927.
65. Wauquier A., Niemegeers C.J.E. Effects of chlorpheniramine, pyrilamine and astemizole on intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Eur. J. Pharmac. 72:1981;245.
66. Wise R.A. The role of reward pathways in the development of drug dependence. Pharmac. Ther. 35:1987;227.
67. Yanai K., Son L.Z., Endou M., Sakurai E., Nakagawasai T., Tadano T., Kisara K., Inoue I., Watanabe T. Behavioral characterization and amounts of brain monoamines and their metabolites in mice lacking histamine H1-receptors. Neuroscience. 87:1998;479.
68. Young G.B., Boyd D., Kreeft J. Dimenhydrate: evidence for dependence and tolerance. Can. med. Assoc. J. 138:1988;437.
69. Zahm D.S., Heimer L. Specifity in the efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat: comparison of the rostral pole projection patterns with those of the core and the shell. J. comp. Neurol. 327:1993;220.