Comparison of wounds created by non-bladed trocars and pyramidal tip trocars in the pig

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 455-461

  Kolata, Ronald J ^a   Ransick, Mark ^a   Briggs, Lori ^a   Baum, David ^a  

^a ETHICON INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL WOUND; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TROCAR;

EID: 0032874058     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.455     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Semm K: Cutting versus conical tip designs. Endosc Surg 1995;3:39-47.
2. Bhoyrul S, Mori T, Way W: Radially expanding dilation: A superior method of laparoscopic trocar access. Surg Endosc 1996;10:775-778.
3. Turner DJ: A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1996;3: 609-615.