Female preferences for temporal order of call components in the tungara frog: A Bayesian analysis

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 841-851

  Wilczynski, Walter ^a   Rand, Stanley A ^a   Ryan, Michael J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FROG;

ANIMALIA; ANURA; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS;

EID: 0032871968     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1208     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Basolo A. Female preference predates the evolution of sword in swordtails. Science. 250:1990;808-810.
2. Bodner D. A. The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 178:1996;173-182.
3. Burley N. The organization of behavior and the evolution of sexually selected traits. Gowaty P. A., Mock D. W. Avian Monogamy. Ornithological Monographs. Vol. 37. 1985;22-44 American Ornithologists' Union, Washington D.C.
4. Capranica R. R. The Evoked Vocal Response of the Bullfrog. 1965;MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Capranica R. R., Moffat A. J. M. Nonlinear properties of the peripheral auditory system of anurans. Popper A. N., Fay R. R. Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates. 1980;139-165 Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. Ehret G., Capranica R. R. Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 141:1980a;13-18.
7. Ehret G., Capranica R. R. Masking patterns and filter characteristics of auditory nerve fibers in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 141:1980b;1-12.
8. Freedman E. G., Ferragamo M., Simmons A. M. Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). II. Physiological effects. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 84:1988;2081-2091.
9. Gerhardt H. C. Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Animal Behaviour. 35:1987;581-595.
10. Gerhardt H. C. Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. Fritzsch B., Ryan M. J., Wilczynski W., Hetherington T., Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. 1988;253-273 J. Wiley, New York.
11. Gerhardt H. C. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour. 42:1991;615-635.
12. Gerhardt H. C. Conducting playback experiments and interpreting their results. McGregor P. K. Playback Studies of Animal Communication. 1992;59-77 Plenum, New York.
13. Gerhardt H. C., Watson G. F. Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog. Animal Behaviour. 50:1995;1187-1191.
14. Iverson G. R. Bayesian Statistical Inference. 1984;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
15. Jennions M. D., Bishop P. J., Blackwell P. R. Y., Passmore N. I. Call rate variability and female choice in the African frog, Hyperolius marmoratus. Behaviour. 132:1995;709-720.
16. Jones I. L., Hunter F. M. Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets. Behavioral Ecology. 9:1998;187-192.
17. Kahneman D., Triesman A. Changing views of attention and automaticity. Parasuraman R., Davies D. R. Varieties of Attention. 1984;29-61 Academic Press, New York.
18. Kime N. M., Rand A. S., Kapfer M., Ryan M. J. Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters. Animal Behaviour. 55:1998;641-649.
19. Klump G. M., Gerhardt H. C. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature. 326:1987;286-288.
20. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;451-468.
21. McClintock W. J., Uetz G. W. Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour. 52:1996;167-181.
22. Megela A. L., Capranica R. R. Differential patterns of physiological masking in the anuran auditory nerve. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 61:1982;641-645.
23. Morris G. K., Fullard J. H. Random noise and congeneric discrimination in Conocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Gwynn D. T., Morris G. K. Orthopteran Mating Systems: Sexual Competition in a Diverse Group of Insects. 1978;73-96 Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
24. Narins P. M. Effects of masking noise on evoked calling in the Puerto Rican coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 147:1982;439-446.
25. Nelson D. A., Marler P. The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. Stebbins W. C., Berkeley M. A. Comparative Perception Volume II: Complex Signals. 1990;443-478 J. Wiley, New York.
26. Passmore N. I., Bishop P. J., Caithness N. Calling behaviour influences mating success in male painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus. Ethology. 92:1992;227-241.
27. Pollack G. S., Hoy R. Phonotaxis to individual rhythm components of a complex cricket calling song. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 144:1981;367-373.
28. Rand A. S. An overview of anuran acoustic communication. Fritzsch B., Ryan M. J., Wilczynski W., Hetherington T., Walkowiak W. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. 1988;415-431 J. Wiley, New York.
29. Rand A. S., Ryan M. J. The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a neotropical frog. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 57:1981;209-214.
30. Rand A. S., Ryan M. J., Wilczynski W. Signal redundancy and receiver permissiveness in acoustic mate recognition by the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. American Zoologist. 32:1992;81-90.
31. Ronken D. A. Spike discharge properties that are related to the characteristic frequency of single units in the frog auditory nerve. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 90:1991;2428-2440.
32. Ryan M. J. The Túngara Frog, a Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. 1985;University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
33. Ryan M. J. Sexual selection and communication in frogs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 6:1991;351-354.
34. Ryan M. J., Keddy-Hector A. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. American Naturalist Supplement. 139:1992;4-35.
35. Ryan M. J., Rand A. S. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution. 44:1990;305-314.
36. Ryan M. J., Rand A. S. Phylogenetic patterns of behavioral mate recognition systems in Physalaemus pustulosus species group (Anura: Leptodactylidae): the role of ancestral and derived characters and sensory exploitation. Edwards D., Lees D. Evolutionary Patterns and Processes, Linnean Society Symposium Series, No. 14. 1993a;251-267 Academic Press, London.
37. Ryan M. J., Rand A. S. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution. 47:1993b;647-657.
38. Ryan M. J., Rand A. S. Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: preexisting biases in male recognition. Animal Behaviour. 56:1999;1509.
39. Ryan M. J., Rand A. S. Phylogenetic inference and the evolution of communication in túngara frogs. Konishi M., Hauser M. Neural Bases of Communication. In press;MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
40. Ryan M. J., Wagner W. E. Asymmetries in mating preference between species: female swordtails prefer heterospecific mates. Science. 236:1987;595-597.
41. Ryan M. J., Wilczynski W. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science. 240:1988;1786-1788.
42. Ryan M. J., Fox J. H., Wilczynski W., Rand A. S. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature. 343:1990;66-67.
43. Ryan M. J., Perrill S. A., Wilczynski W. Auditory tuning and call frequency predict population-based mating preferences in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. American Naturalist. 139:1992;1370-1383.
44. Simmons A. M. Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). I. Behavioral effects. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 83:1988;1087-1092.
45. Sullivan B. K. Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice. Animal Behaviour. 31:1983;1011-1017.
46. Sullivan B. K., Hinshaw S. H. Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Animal Behaviour. 44:1992;733-744.
47. Triesman A. M. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychology Review. 76:1969;282-299.
48. Wells K. D. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour. 25:1977;666-693.
49. Wickens C. D. Processing resources in attention. Parasuraman R., Davies D. R. Varieties of Attention. 1984;63-102 Academic Press, New York.
50. Wilczynski W., Capranica R. R. The auditory system of anuran amphibians. Progress in Neurobiology. 22:1984;1-38.
51. Wilczynski W., Rand A. S., Ryan M. J. The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Animal Behaviour. 49:1995;911-929.