Children's attitudes toward interacting with peers with different craniofacial anomalies

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 441-447

  Reed, Julie ^a   Robathan, Magali ^d   Hockenhull, Anna ^a   Rostill, Helen ^b   Perrett, David ^c   Lees, Andie ^a  

^a BIRMINGHAM CHILDREN S HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b North Warwickshire NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Attitudes; Children; Craniofacial; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF ESTEEM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0032870016     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1999)036<0441:CSATIW>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahmad Y, Whitney I, Smith PK. A survey service for schools on bully/victim problems. In: Smith PK, Thompson DA, eds. Practical Approaches to Bullying. London: David Fulton; 1991.
2. Broder HL, Smith FB, Strauss RP. Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:429-436.
3. Dion KK, Berscheid E. Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children. Sociometry 1974;37:1-12.
4. Hayduck LA. Personal space: an evaluative and orienting review. Psychol Bull 1978;85:117-134.
5. Jarvie GJ, Lahey B, Graziano W, Framer E. Childhood obesity and social stigma: what we know and what we don't know. Devel Rev 1983;3:237-273.
6. Kapp-Simon KA, McGuire DE. Observed social interaction patterns in adolescents with and without craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:380-384.
7. Kleck R, Buck PL, Goller WL, London RS, Pfeiffer JR, Vukcevic DP. Effect of stigmatizing conditions on the use of personal space. Psychol Rep 1968; 23:111-118.
8. Langlois J, Styczynski L. The effects of physical attractiveness on the behavioral attributions and peer preferences of acquainted children. Int J Behav Devel 1979;2:325-341.
9. Lansdown R, Polak L. Study of the psychological effects of facial deformity in children. Child Care Health Devel 1975;1:85-91.
10. Lerner RM, Schroeder C. Kindergarten children's active vocabulary about body build. Devel Psychol 1971;5:179.
11. Lerner RM, Schroeder C. Racial attitudes in young white children: a methodological analysis. J Genet Psychol 1975;127:3-12.
12. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. Gender segregation in childhood. In: Reese EH, ed. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1987:239-287.
13. Maccoby EE. Gender as a social category. Devel Psychol 1988;24:755-765.
14. Pillemer FG, Cook KV. The psychological adjustment of pediatric craniofacial patients after surgery. Cleft Palate J 1989;26:201-207.
15. Richardson SA. Age and sex differences in values toward physical handicaps. J Health Soc Behav 1970;11:207-214.
16. Rostill H. Children's Attitudes Towards Facial Disfigurement. Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham School of Psychology; 1997. Thesis.
17. Rowland DA, Perrett DI. Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics Appl 1995;15:70-76.
18. Rumsey N, Bull R, Gahagan D. The effect of facial disfigurement on the proxemic behavior of the general public. J Appl Soc Psychol 1982;12:137-150.
19. Sigelman CK, Miller TE, Whitworth LA. The early development of stigmatizing reactions to physical differences. J Appl Devel Psychol 1986;7:17-32.
20. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:82-86.