Net effect of forest harvest on CO2 emissions to the atmosphere: A sensitivity analysis on the influence of time

Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 314-325

  Schlamadinger, B ^a,b   Marland, G ^b  

^a JOANNEUM RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HARVESTING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032868470     PISSN: 02806509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16289     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adams, J. 1997. An inventory of data for reconstructing "natural steady state" carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. http://www.esd.ornl.gov/ern/qen/carbon1.html.
2. Bird, N. 1997. Personal communication.
3. Birdsey, R. A. 1996. Regional estimates of timber volume and forest carbon for managed timberland. Appendix 4 to Forests and global change, vol. 2. Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions (eds. Sampson, R. N. and Hair, D.). American Forests, Washington DC, 20013.
4. Cooper, C. F. 1983. Carbon storage in managed forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 155-166.
5. Dewar, R. C. 1991. Analytical model of carbon storage in the trees, soils and wood products of managed forests. Tree Physiology 8, 239-258.
6. Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K. and Franklin, J. F. 1990. Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247, 699-701.
7. Karjalainen, T. and Asikainen, A. 1996. Greenhouse gas emissions from the use of primary energy in forest operations and long-distance transportation of timber in Finland. Forestry 69, 216-228.
8. Marland, G. and Marland, S. 1992. Should we store carbon in trees? Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 64, 181-195.
9. Marland, G. and Schlamadinger, B. 1995. Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: how do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits? Energy 20, 1131-1140.
10. Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B. and Leiby, P. 1997. Forest/biomass based mitigation strategies: does the timing of carbon reductions matter? Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27, 213-226.
11. Nilsson, S. and Schopfhauser, W. 1995. The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program. Climatic Change 30, 267-293.
12. Price, D. T., Mair, R. M., Kurz, W. A. and Apps, M. J. 1996. Effects of forest management, harvesting and wood processing on ecosystem carbon dynamics: a boreal case study. In: Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle (eds. Apps, M. J. and Price, D. T.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 279-292.
13. Schlamadinger, B., Canella, L., Marland, G. and Spitzer, J. 1998. Bioenergy strategies and the global carbon cycle. Sciences Geologiques 50, 1-4.
14. Schlamadinger, B. and Marland, G. 1996. The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy 10, 275-300.