Propofol reduces the migration of human leukocytes through endothelial cell monolayers

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1843-1847

  Hofbauer, Roland ^a   Frass, Michael ^b   Salfinger, Heribert ^b   Moser, Doris ^b   Hornykewycz, Stephan ^b   Gmeiner, Bernhard ^b   Kapiotis, Stylianos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Anesthetics; Critically ill patients; Endothelial cells; Formyl methyl leucyl phenylalanine; Intravenous drugs; Leukocyte migration; Leukocytes; Monolayer; Propofol

Indexed keywords

FORMYLMETHIONYLLEUCYLPHENYLALANINE; PROPOFOL; SOLVENT;

ANESTHESIA MECHANISM; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFLAMMATION; LEUKOCYTE MIGRATION; MONOLAYER CULTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDATION;

ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELLS, CULTURED; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENDOTHELIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; LEUKOCYTES; MALE; N-FORMYLMETHIONINE LEUCYL-PHENYLALANINE; PROPOFOL; REFERENCE VALUES; VOLUNTARY WORKERS;

EID: 0032867921     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1. Swan D: Propofol and midazolam for sedation of the critically ill. Letter. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1761
2. 2. Barrientos-Vega R, Mar-Sanchez-Soria M, Morales-Garcia C, et al: Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: Impact on weaning and costs. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:33-40
3. 3. Reed MD, Yamashita TS, Marx CM, et al: A pharmacokinetically based propofol dosing strategy for sedation of the critically ill, mechanically ventilated pediatric patient. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:1473-1481
4. 4. Chamorro C, de Latorre FJ, Montero A, et al: Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:932-939
5. 5. Mirski MA, Muffelman B, Ulatowski JA, et al: Sedation for the critically ill neurologic patient. Crit Care Med 1995; 23:2038-2053
6. 6. Millane TA, Bennett ED, Grounds RM: Isoflurane and propofol for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit: A crossover study. Anesthesia 1992; 47:768-774
7. 7. Bennett SN, McNeil MM, Bland LA, et al: Postoperative infections traced to contamination of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:147-154
8. 8. Sklar GE: Propofol and postoperative infections. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31:1521-1523
9. 9. Carlos TM, Harlan JM: Leukocyte-endothelial adhesion molecules. Blood 1994; 84: 2068-2101
10. 10. Kress HG, Segmueller R: Intravenous anesthetics and human neutrophil granulocyte motility in vitro. Anaesthesist 1987; 36: 356-361
11. 11. Skoutelis A, Lianou P, Papageorgiou E, et al: Effects of propofol and thiopentone on polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions in vitro. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38:858-862
12. 12. Rossano F, Tufano R, Cipollaro de L'Ero G, et al: Anesthetic agents induce human mononuclear leukocytes to release cytokines. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1992; 14: 439-450
13. 13. Weiss M, Buhl R, Medve M, et al: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha modulates the selective interference of hypnotics and sedatives to suppress N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-induced oxidative burst formation in neutrophils. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:128-134
14. 14. Hofbauer R, Moser D, Hammerschmidt V, et al: Ketamine significantly reduces the migration of leukocytes through endothelial cell monolayers. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1545-1549
15. 15. Metcalf JA, Gallin JI, Nauseef WM, et al: Preparation of cells and materials for functional assays. In: Neutrophil Purification. Metcalf JA (Ed). New York, Raven Press, 1986, pp 57-63
16. 16. Jaffe EA: Culture of human endothelial cells identification of large vessel endothelial cells. In: Biology of Endothelial Cells. Jaffe EA (Ed). Boston, The Hugue, 1984, pp 23-47
17. 17. Shasby DM, Shasby SS: Endothelial cells grown on filter membranes. In: Cell Culture Techniques in Heart and Vessel Research. Shasby DM (Ed). New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990. pp86-121
18. 18. Sunder-Plassmann G, Hofbauer R, Sengoelge G, et al: Quantification of leukocyte migration: Improvement of a method. Immunol Invest 1996; 25:49-63
19. 19. Dollery C: Propofol. In: Therapeutic Drugs. Dollery C (Ed). London, William Clowes, 1991, pp 269-271
20. 20. Sillaber C, Baghestanian M, Hofbauer R, et al: Molecular and functional characterization of the urokinase receptor on human mast cells. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:7824-7832
21. 21. Baghestanian M, Hofbauer R, Kress HG, et al: Thrombin augments vascular cell-dependent migration of human mast cells: Role of MGF. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77:577-584
22. 22. Baghestanian M, Hofbauer R, Kiener HC, et al: The c-kit ligand stem cell factor and anti-IgE promote expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human lung mast cells. Blood 1997; 90:4438-4449
23. 23. Weston SA, Parrish CR: New fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration studies - Analysis of flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. J Immunol Methods 1990; 133:87-90
24. 24. Haugland RP: Fluorescent dyes for assessing vital cell functions. In: Handbook of Molecular Probes. Haugland RP (Ed). Eugene, OR: Molecular Probes, 1993, pp 365-377
25. 25. Dierich MP, Wilhelmi D, Till G: Essential role of surface-bound chemoattractant in leukocyte migration. Nature 1977; 270: 351-352
26. 26. Nieto M, Frade JM, Sancho D, et al: Polarisation of chemokine receptors to the leading edge during lymphocyte chemotaxis. J Exp Med 1997; 186:153-158
27. 27. Nishina K, Akamatsu H, Mikawa K, et al: The inhibitory effects of thiopental, midazolam, and ketamine on human neutrophil functions. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:159-165
28. 28. Murphy PG, Ogilvy AJ, Whiteley SM: The effect of propofol on the neutrophil respiratory burst. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1996; 13:471-473
29. 29. Weiss M, Birkhahn A, Krone M, et al: Do etomidate and propofol influence oxygen radical production of neutrophils? Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1996; 18:291-307
30. 30. Hulse D, Kusel JR, O'Donnell NG, et al: Effects of anaesthetics on membrane mobility and locomotor responses of human neutrophils. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1994; 8:241-248
31. 31. O'Donnell NG, McSharry CP, Wilkinson PC, et al: Comparison of the inhibitory effect of propofol, thiopentone and midazolam on neutrophil polarisation in vitro in the presence or absence of human serum albumin. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:70-74
32. 32. Kamitani K, Yamazaki M, Yukitaka M, et al: Effects of propofol on isolated rabbit mesenteric arteries and veins. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75:457-461
33. 33. Gacar N, Gok S, Kalyoncu NI, et al: The effect of endothelium on the response to propofol on bovine coronary artery rings. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39:1080-1083