Quantitative assessment of bladder cancer by nuclear texture analysis using automated high resolution image cytometry

Modern Pathology

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 806-813

  Gschwendtner, Andreas ^a   Hoffmann Weltin, Yvonne ^a   Mikuz, Gregor ^a   Mairinger, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bladder cancer; Image analysis; Nuclear texture analysis

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; BLADDER IRRIGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIPLOIDY; FEMALE; FEULGEN STAINING; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URODYNAMICS; UROGENITAL TRACT TUMOR; UROTHELIUM;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; CHROMATIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PAPILLOMA; PLOIDIES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0032867028     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Keller JW, McCune CS, Sahasrabhe DM. Urologic and male genital cancers. In: Rubin P, editor. Clinical oncology: a multidisciplinary approach for physicians and students. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993. p. 425-32.
2. Walker L, Liston TG, Lloyd-Davies RW. Does flexible cystoscopy miss more tumors than rod-lens examination? Br J Urol 1993;72:449-50.
3. Oosterlinck W, Kurth KH, Schröder F, Sylvester R, Hammond B. A plea for cold biopsy, fulguration, and immediate bladder instillation with epirubicin in small superficial bladder tumors: data from the EOURTC GU Group Study 30863. Eur Urol 1993;23:457-9.
4. Badalament RA, Kimmel M, Gay H, Cibas ES, Whitmore WF Jr, Herr HW, Fair WR, Melamed MR. The sensitivity of flow cytometry compared with conventional cytology in the detection of superficial bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1987;59: 2078-85.
5. Wheeless LL, Badalament RA, de Vere White RW, Fradet Y, Tribukait B. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in bladder cancer. Cytometry 1993;14:478-81.
6. Kirollos MM, McDermott S, Bradbrook RA. The performance characteristics of the bladder tumour antigen test. Br J Urol 1997;80:30-4.
7. Pariente JL, Bordenave L, Michael P, Latapie MJ, Ducassou D, Le Guillou M. Initial evaluation of CYFRA-21-1 diagnostic performances as a urinary marker in bladder transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol 1997;158:338-41.
8. Golijanin D, Sherman Y, Shapiro A, Pode D. Detection of bladder tumors by immunostaining of the Lewis X antigen in cells from voided urine. Urology 1995;46:173-7.
9. Attallah AM, el-Didi M, Seif F, el-Mohamady H, Dalbagni G. Comparative study between cytology and dot-ELISA for early detection of bladder cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105:109-14.
10. Steiner G, Schoenberg MP, Linn JF, Mao L, Sidransky D. Detection of bladder cancer recurrence by microsatellite analysis of urine. Nat Med 1997;3:621-4.
11. Cajulis RS, Haines GK 3rd, Frias-Hidvegi D, McVary K. Interphase cytogenetics as an adjunct in the cytodiagnosis of urinary bladder carcinoma: a comparative study of cytology, flow cytometry, and interphase cytogenetics in bladder washes. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1994;16:1-10.
12. Bibbo M, Bartels PH, Sychra JJ, Wied GL. Chromatin appearance in intermediate cells from patients with uterine cancer. Acta Cytol 1981;25:23-8.
13. Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Dytch HE, Pishotta FT, Yamauchi K, Wied GL. Diagnostic marker displays for intermediate cells from the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1982;26:29-34.
14. King EB, Chew KL, Duarte L, Horn JD, Mayall BH, Miller TR, et al. Image cytometric classification of premalignant breast disease in fine-needle aspirates. Cancer 1988;62:114-24.
15. van den Houte K, Kiss R, de Prez C, Verhest A, Pasteels JL, van Velthofen R. Use of computerized cell image analysis to characterize cell nucleus populations from normal and neoplastic renal tissue. Eur Urol 1991;19:155-64.
16. Wied GL, Bibbo M, Pishotta FT, Bartels PH. Intermediate cell markers for malignancy: consistency of expression. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1984;8:243-6.
17. Rosenthal DL, Suttin S. Predictive value of digitized cell images for the prognosis of cervical neoplasia. In: Wied GL, editor. Computer-assisted image analysis cytology. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology; 1984. p. 163-80.
18. Koss LG, Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Freed SZ, Taylor J, Wied GL. Computer discrimination between benign and malignant urothelial cells. Acta Cytol 1975;19:378-91.
19. Fossa SD, Kaalhus O. Nuclear size and chromatin concentration in transitional cell carcinoma of the human urinary bladder. Beitr Pathol 1976;157:109-25.
20. Fossa SD, Kaalhus O. "Noncondensed" and "condensed" chromatin in transitional cell carcinoma of the human urinary bladder. Beitr Pathol 1976;158:241-54.
21. Garner DM, Harrison A, MacAulay C, Palcic B. Cyto-Savant and its use in automated screening of cervical smears. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, editors. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology; 1994. p. 346-52.
22. van der Poel HG, Witjes JA, van Stratum P, Boon ME, Debruyne FMJ, Schalken JA. Quanticyt: karyometric analysis of bladder washing for patients with superficial bladder cancer. Urology 1996;48:357-64.
23. Colombel M, del Launoit Y, Bellot J, Kiss R, Abbou C, Chopin D. Prognostic evaluation of morphonuclear parameters in superficial and invasive bladder cancer. Br J Urol 1995;75: 364-9.
24. van Velthofen R, Petein M, Oosterlinck WJ, Raviv G, Janssen T, Roels H, et al. The additional predictive value contributed by quantitative chromatin pattern description as compared to DNA ploidy level measurement in 257 superficial bladder transitional cell carcinomas. Eur Urol 1996;29:245-51.
25. Wojcik EM, Miller MC, O'Dowd GJ, Veltri RW. Value of computer-assisted quantitative nuclear grading in differentiation of normal urothelial cells from low- and high-grade transitional cell carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20: 69-76.
26. Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H, editors. Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours. International classification of tumours. No. 10 Geneva: World Health Organization; 1973.
27. Murphy WM, Beckwith BJ, Farrow GM. Tumors of the urinary bladder. In: Murphy WM, Beckwith BJ, Farrow GM, editors. Atlas of tumor pathology. Third series. Fasc. 11. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993. p. 193-297.
28. Mikel UV. Quantitative staining techniques for image cytometry. In: Mikel UV, editor. Advanced laboratory methods in histology and pathology. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1994. p. 131-59.
29. MacAulay C, Palcic B. Fractal texture features based on optical density surface area. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1990;12: 394-8.
30. Lockart RZ, Pezzella KM, Kelley MM, Toy ST. Features independent of stain intensity for evaluating Feulgen-stained cells. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1984;6:105-11.
31. Komitowski D, Zinser G. Quantitative description of chromatin structure during neoplasia by the method of image processing. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1985;7:178-82.
32. Schulerud H, Kristensen G B, Liestol K, Vlatkovic L, Reith A, Albregtsen F, et al. A review of caveats in statistical nuclear image analysis. Anal Cell Pathol 1998;16:63-82.
33. Devonec M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Kostyrka-Claps M, Collste B, Whitmore W Jr, Melamed M. Flow cytometry of low-stage bladder tumors: correlation with cytologic and cystoscopic diagnosis. Cancer 1982;49:109-18.
34. Raudys S, Jain A. Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intellm 1991;13:252-64.
35. James NT. Common statistical errors in morphometry. Path Res Pract 1989;185:764-8.