Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum?

Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 251-252

  Bachrach, Christine A ^a   Newcomer, Susan ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTION; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICS;

AMERICAS; CRITIQUE; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; FERTILITY; FERTILITY MEASUREMENTS; FERTILIZATION; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; POPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, PLANNED; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0032865340     PISSN: 00147354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991577     Document Type: Short Survey

References (4)

1. Kaestner R, Other consequences of unintended pregnancies, paper presented at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development conference The Determinants of Unintended Pregnancy in the US., Bethesda,MD, Mar. 11-12,1999.
2. Miller W, Reproductive decisions: how we make them and how they make us, in: Severy LJ, ed., Advances in Population, Vol. 2, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd, 1994, pp. 1-27.
3. Stanford J and Dewitt ], Defining the dimensions of pregnancy intendedness, paper presented at the Research Conference on the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, Hyattsville, MD, Oct. 15-14,1998.
4. Thomson E and Brandreth Y, Measuring fertility demand, Demography, 1995,32(l):81-96.