The scope of electrodiagnostic medicine

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 22, Issue 8 SUPPL. 8, 1999, Pages

  Busis, Neil A ^a   Nora, Lois M ^a   Aalbers, John A ^a   Ackil Md, Albert A ^a   Barkhaus, Paul E ^a   Berger, Alan R ^a   Bierner, Samuel M ^a   Steven Block, H ^a   Braker, Arlene M ^a   Cosgrove, James L ^a   Dillingham, Timothy R ^a   Donofrio, Peter D ^a   Fisher, Morris A ^a   Geiringer, Steve R ^a   Gonzalez, Ronald H ^a   Goodenough, David J ^a   Hackett, Earl R ^a   Hurd, Marvin M ^a   Jacob, Joseph P ^a   Kraft, George H ^a   Kurtzke, Robert N ^a   Lachman, Tim ^a   Lee, Michael Y ^a   Maragos, Valerie A ^a   Marder, Ellen J ^a   Myers, Mary Ann U ^a   Nelson, Kevin R ^a   Pascuzzi, Robert M ^a   Rao, Keshav R ^a   Raynor, Elizabeth M ^a   Rechtien, James J ^a   Robinton, John E ^a   Singh, Surinderjit ^a   Sridhara, Channarayapatna R ^a   Werner, Robert A ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

EMG; Equipment; Laboratory organization; Qualifications; Reports

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; LABORATORY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICINE; PARAMEDICAL DISCIPLINES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032863639     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: Directory of Graduate Medical Education Programs. Chicago, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 1993-1994.
2. American Academy of Neurology. Minutes of Executive Board Meeting 11.9 (1) December 2, 1981.
3. American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Statement re: Clinical Diagnostic Electromyography, November 1983.
4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs: Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients During and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Pediatrics1992; 89, No.6:1110-1115.
5. American Medical Association. House of Delegates Policy 275.990. American Medical Association Policy Compendium, 1995 Edition.
6. Buckelew SP, Conway RC, Shutty MS, Lawrence JA, Grafing MR, Anderson SK, Hewett JE, Keefe FJ: Spontaneous coping strategies to manage acute pain and anxiety during electrodiagnostic studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73:594-598.
7. Coniglia v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners No. A-3435-74 (Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division June 17, 1976).
8. Daube JR: The description of motor unit potentials in electromyography. Neurology 1978; 28:623-625.
9. Department of Health and Human Services. FDA Final Rule: Medical Devices: Establishment of a performance standard for electrode lead wires and patient cables. Federal Register, No. 90, May 9, 1997, pp. 25477-25498.
10. Desmedt JE: Identification and titration of myasthenic defect by nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1962; 22(suppl):63-64.
11. Gans BH, Kraft GH: Pain perception in clinical electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977; 58:13-16.
12. Guld C, Rosenfalck A, Willison R: Technical factors in recording electrical activity of muscle and nerve in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28:399-413.
13. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 601-1 (Safety of medical electrical equipment, Part 1: General requirements) subclause 56.3(c) (1995).
14. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals: Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Chicago, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, 1988, p 200.
15. Kaplan RM, Metzger G, Jablecki C: Brief cognitive and relaxation training increases tolerance for a painful clinical electromyographic examination. Psychosom Med 1983; 45:155-162.
16. Khoshbin S, Hallett M, Lunbeck R: Predictors of patients experience of pain in EMG Muscle Nerve 1977; 10:629-632.
17. Kimura J: Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Muscle and Nerve. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Company, 1983, pp 617-619.
18. LaJoie WJ: Analgesia in electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1963; 44:42-44.
19. Lambert EH: Recent Advances in Clinical Electromyography: Third Annual Continuing Education Course. Rochester, Minnesota, American Association of Electromyography and Electrodiagnosis, 1980, p 60.
20. Pease WS, Boyer BL: Motor unit analysis, comparison between concentric and monopolar electrodes. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1988;88:2-6.
21. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: Accredited Residency Programs. Ottawa, Ontario, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 1993.
22. Sanders DB, Howard JE: AAEM Minimonograph #25: Single-Fiber Electromyography in Myasthenia Gravis. Rochester, Minnesota, American Association of Electromyography and Electrodiagnosis, 1987.
23. Sherman HB, Walker FO, Donofrio, PD: Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation potentials: a comparison between concentric and monopolar needle electrodes. Muscle Nerve 1990;12;1023-1026.
24. Stålberg EV, Trontelj JV: Single Fibre Electromyography. Old Woking, Surry, Mirvalle Press, 1979.
25. Underwriters Laboratories Inc: Standard For Medical and Dental Equipment, UL 544, ed 2. Northbrook, Illinois, Underwriters Laboratories Inc, 1976.
26. Veterans' Administration. Professional Services Letter: Professional Qualifications for Performing Electromyographic Examinations IL-11-80-1, January 4, 1980.