Usefulness of parameters of left ventricular wall stress and systolic function in the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis

Echocardiography

Volumn 16, Issue 7 I, 1999, Pages 701-710

  Legget, Malcolm E ^a  

^a GREEN LANE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Afterload; Aortic stenosis; Ventricular function; Wall stress

Indexed keywords

AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEART AFTERLOAD; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTOLE;

EID: 0032863542     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1999.tb00127.x     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Olson LJ, Edwards WD, Tajik AJ: Aortic valve stenosis: Etiology, pathophysiology, evaluation and management. Curr Probl Cardiol 1987;12: 455-508.
2. Lindholm D, Lindholm U, Qvist J: Long term relative survival rates after heart valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:566-573.
3. Carabello BA: Timing of valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Circulation 1997;95:2241-2243.
4. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al: Prospective study of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: Clinical, echocardiographic and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997;95:2262-2270.
5. Lund O, Flo C, Jensen FT, et al: Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1977-1987.
6. Reichek N, Wilson J, St John Sutton M, et al: Non invasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress: Validation of the method and initial application. Circulation 1982;65:99-108.
7. Quinones MA, Mokotoff DM, Nouri S, et al: Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular wall stress: Validation of method and application to assessment of chronic pressure overload. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:782-790.
8. Gaasch WH, Zile MR, Hoshino PK, et al: Stress-shortening relations and myocardial blood flow in compensated and failing canine hearts with pressure overload hypertrophy. Circulation 1989;79:872-883.
9. Stamm RB, Martin RP: Quantitation of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;2:707-718.
10. Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al: Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985; 71:1162-1169.
11. Otto CM, Pearlman AS: Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis: Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2553-2560.
12. Scholler GF, Colan SD, Sanders SP, et al: Non-invasive estimation of left ventricular pressure waveform throughout ejection in young patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:492.
13. Carabello BA: The relationship of left ventricular geometry and hypertrophy to left ventricular function in valvular heart disease. J Heart Value Dis 1995;4(suppl II):S132-S139.
14. Morris JJ, Schaff HV, Mullany CJ, et al: Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:22-30.
15. Krayenbuhl HP, Hess OM, Monrad ES, et al: Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate and late after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1989; 79:744-755.
16. Ross J Jr: Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: Implications for surgical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:811-826.
17. Colan SD, Borow KM, Neumann A: Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of fiber shortening relation: A load-independent index of myocardial contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:715-724.
18. Carroll JD, Carroll EO, Feldman T, et al: Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the elderly. Circulation 1992;86:1099-1107.
19. Aurigemma GP, Silver KH, McLaughlin M, et al: Impact of left ventricular geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients >60 years of age with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:794-798.
20. Legget ME, Kuusisto J: Healy NL, et al: Gender differences in left ventricular function at rest and with exercise in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 131:94-100.
21. Donner R, Carabello BA, Black I, et al: Diminished wall stress in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:946-951.
22. Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Batista S, et al: Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement: A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1679-1683.
23. Gunther S, Grossman W: Determinants of ventricular function in pressure overload hypertrophy in man. Circulation 1979;59:679-688.
24. DePace NL, Ren J-F, Iskandrian AS, et al: Correlation of echocardiographic wall stress and left ventricular pressure and function in aortic stenosis. Circulation 1983;67:854-859.
25. Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, et al: Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation 1980;56:22-30.
26. Dineen E, Brent BN: Aortic valve stenosis: Comparison of patients with to those without chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:419-422.
27. Omran H, Fehske W, Rabahich R, et al: Valvular aortic stenosis: Risk of syncope. J Heart Value Dis 1996;5:31-34.
28. Julius BK, Spillmann M, Vassali G, et al: Angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries: Mechanisms and pathophysiological concepts. Circulation 1997; 95:892-898.