Genetic medicine: An experiment in community-expert interaction

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 335-339

  Schibeci, Renato ^a   Barns, Ian ^a   Shaw, Robyn ^a   Davison, Aidan ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Gene technology; Genetic medicine; Health communication; Public policy; Public understanding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONFIDENTIALITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL GENETICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; VOLUNTEER; WORKSHOP;

EID: 0032863292     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.4.335     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Joss S, Durant J, eds Public participation in science: the role of consensus conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum, 1995.
2. Hamstra A. The role of the public in instruments of constructive technology assessment. See reference 1: 53-66.
3. Gamson W. Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
4. Durant J, Hansen A, Bauer M. Public understanding of the new genetics. In: Marteau T, Richards M, eds. The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 235-48.