Parietal and occipital lobe contributions to perception of straight ahead orientation

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 572-578

  Ferber, Susanne ^a   Karnath, Hans Otto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Brain damage; Hemianopia; Spatial neglect; Subjective straight ahead

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0032863196     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.572     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Werner H, Wapner S, Bruell JH. Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception: VI. Effect of position of head, eyes, and of object on position of the apparent median plane. J Exp Psychol 1953;42:346-50.
2. Jeannerod M, Biguer B. Référence égocentrique et espace représenté. Rev Neurol 1989;45:635-9.
3. Fischer MH, Kornmüller AE. Egozentrische Lokalisation. 2. Mitteilung (optische Richtungslosigkeit beim vestibulären Nystagmus). J Psychol Neurol 1931;41:383-420.
4. Brecher GA, Brecher MH, Kommerell G, et al. Relation of optical and labyrinthean orientation. Optica Acta 1972;19: 467-71.
5. Hamann KF, Strauss K, Kellner M, et al. Dependence of visual straight ahead on vestibular influences. In: Krejcova H, Jerabek J, eds. Proceedings of XVIIth Bárány Society Meeting. Castle Dobris, Czechoslovakia: Bárány Society, 1992:65-6.
6. Biguer B, Donaldson IML, Hein A, et al. Neck muscle vibration modifies the representation of visual motion and direction in man. Brain 1988;111:1405-24.
7. Karnath H-O, Sievering D, Fetter M. The interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation to subjective "straight ahead" orientation in man. Exp Brain Res 1994;101:140-6.
8. Grüsser O-J, Pause M, Schreiter U. Localization and responses of neurones in the parieto-insular vestibular cortex of awake monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Physiol (Lond) 1990;430:537-57.
9. Grüsser O-J, Pause M, Schreiter U. Vestibular neurones in the parieto-insular cortex of monkeys (Mcaca fascicularis): visual and neck receptor responses. J Physiol (Lond) 1990; 430:559-83.
10. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Watson RT. Performance on hemispatial pointing tasks by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 1983;33:661-4.
11. Mark VE, Heilman KM. Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects. Neurology 1990;40:640-3.
12. Karnath H-O. Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. Brain 1994;117:1001-12.
13. Karnath H-O. Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1997;352:1411-9.
14. Vallar G, Guariglia C, Nico D, et al. Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain 1995;118:467-72.
15. Chokron S, Imbert M. Variations of the egocentric reference among normal subjects and a patient with unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:703-11.
16. Perenin MT. Optic ataxia and unilateral neglect: clinical evidence for dissociable spatial functions in posterior parietal cortex. In: P Thier, H-O Karnath, eds. Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space. Heidelberg: Springer, 1997:289-308.
17. Farnè A, Ponti F, Làdavas E. In search of biased egocentric reference frames in neglect. Neuropsychologia 1998;36:611-23.
18. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998;395:166-9.
19. Axenfeld D. Eine einfache Methode Hemianopsie zu constatiren. Neurologisches Centralblatt 1894;13:437-38.
20. Liepmann H, Kalmus E. Ueber eine Augenmassstörung bei Hemianopikern. Berliner Klin Wochenschrift 1900;38:838-42.
21. Best F. Bemerkungen zur Hemianopsie. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1910;74:400-10.
22. Best F. Die Bedeutung der Hemianopsie für die Untersuchung des optischen Raumsinnes. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie 1910;136:248-62.
23. Strebel J. Über Hemianopien. Archiv für Augenheilkunde 1924;94:27-55.
24. Fuchs W. Untersuchungen über das Sehen der Hemianopiker und Hemiamblyoniker: I. Verlagerungserscheinungen. Z Psychol 1920;84:67-169.
25. Best F. Hemianopsie und Seelenblindheit bei Hirnverletzungen. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1917;93:49-150.
26. Kerkhoff G. Displacement of the egocentric visual midline in altitudinal postchiasmatic scotoma. Neuropsychologia 1993;31:261-5.
27. Zihl J, v Cramon D. Zerebrale Sehstörungen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1986:87-101.
28. Hasselbach M, Butter CM. Ipsilesional displacement of egocentric midline. In: P Thier, H-O Karnath, eds. Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space. Heidelberg: Springer, 1997:579-95.
29. Barton JJS, Black SE. Line bisection in hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:660-2.
30. Chokron S, Bartolomeo P. Patterns of dissociation between left hemineglect and deviation of the egocentric reference. Neuropychologia 1997;35:1503-8.
31. Karnath H-O, Perenin M-T. Tactile exploration of peripersonal space in patients with neglect. Neuroreport 1998;9: 2273-7.
32. Karnath H-O, Niemeier M, Dichgans J. Space exploration in neglect. Brain 1998;121:2357-67.
33. Bisiach E, Rusconi ML Break-down of perceptual awareness in unilateral neglect. Cortex 1990;26:643-9.
34. Tham K, Tegnér R. The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropychological Rehabilitation 1996;6:19-25.
35. Weintraub S, Mesulam M-M. Mental state assessment of young and elderly adults in behavioral neurology. In: Mesulam M-M, ed. Principles of behavioral neurology. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1985.
36. Damasio H, Damasio AR. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.