An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)
4. Sagie A, Larson MG, Goldberg RJ, et al. An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 1992; 70:797-801.
Relation between QT interval and heart rate. Applications and limitations of Bazett's formula
5. Kawataki M, Kashima T, Toda H, et al. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. Applications and limitations of Bazett's formula. J Electrocardiol 1984; 17:371-376.
Relation between QT interval and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values
7. Karjalainen J, Viitasalo M, Mänttäri M, et al. Relation between QT interval and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:1547-1553.
Bazett's QT correction reviewed. Evidence that a linear QT correction for heart rate is better
8. Hodges M, Salerno D, Erlien D. Bazett's QT correction reviewed. Evidence that a linear QT correction for heart rate is better. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:694.
The duration of the QT interval as a function of heart rate: A derivation based on physical principles and a comparison to measured values
9. Kovacs SJ. The duration of the QT interval as a function of heart rate: a derivation based on physical principles and a comparison to measured values. Am Heart J 1985; 110:872-878.
Correction of the QT interval for heart rate: Review of different formulas and the use of Bazett's formula in myocardial infarction
10. Ahnve S. Correction of the QT interval for heart rate: Review of different formulas and the use of Bazett's formula in myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1985; 109:568-574.