The crossed-uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized auditory stimuli is not a measure of interhemispheric transmission time: Evidence from the split brain

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 421-424

  Iacoboni, Marco ^a,b   Zaidel, Eran ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiomotor processing; Commissurotomy; Corpus callosum; Crossed uncrossed difference; Sensorimotor integration

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN COMMISSURE; BRAIN SURGERY; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPLIT BRAIN; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CORPUS CALLOSUM; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032861837     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002210050864     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bogen JE, Vogel PJ (1975) Neurologic status in the long term following complete cerebral commissurotomy. In: Michel F, Schott B (eds) Les syndromes de disconnexion calleuse chez l'homme. Hopital Neurologique, Lyon, pp 227-251
2. Bogen J, Schultz D, Vogel J (1988) Completeness of callosotomy shown by magnetic resonance imaging in the long term. Arch Neurol 45:1203-1205
3. Callan J, Klisz D, Parsons OA (1974) Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. J Exp Psychol 102:1039-4105
4. Clarke J, Zaidel E (1989) Simple reaction times to lateralized flashes: varieties of interhemispheric communication routes. Brain 112:849-870
5. Hasbroucq T, Kornblum S, Osman A (1988) A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Cah Psychol Cogn 8:207-221
6. Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (1995) Channels of the corpus callosum: evidence from simple reaction times to lateralized flashes in the normal and the split brain. Brain 118:779-788
7. Iacoboni M, Fried I, Zaidel E (1994) Callosal transmission time before and after partial commissurotomy. Neuroreport 5:2521-2524
8. Marzi CA, Bisiacchi P, Nicoletti R (1991) Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 29:1163-1177
9. Moscovitch M, Smith L (1979) Differences in neural organization between individuals with inverted and noninverted handwriting postures. Science 205:710-713
10. Poffenberger A (1912) Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nervous centers. Arch Psychol 23:1-73
11. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Rosenquist JN (1996) Auditory cues and inhibition of return: the importance of oculomotor activation. Exp Brain Res 112:119-126
12. Simon JR, Hinrichs JV, Craft JL (1970) Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. J Exp Psychol 86:97-102
13. St. John R, Shields C, Krahn P, Timney B (1987) The reliability of estimates of interhemispheric transmission times derived from unimanual and verbal response latencies. Hum Neurobiol 6:195-202
14. Zaidel E, Iacoboni M (1996) Using a computerized system for behavioral laterality experiments. Brain 119:2155-2156