Functional assessment on the locomotor system;Funktionelles assessment am bewegungssystem

Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 110-121

  Schreiber, T U ^a   Bak, P ^a   Muller W D ^b   Ziegenthaler, H ^a   Smolenski, U ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b Abteilung Orthopadie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Functional examination; Functional measurement; Outcome measures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0032860919     PISSN: 09406689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1061795     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Allison GT, Godfrey P, Robinson G. EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowing. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 1998; 8: 51-57
2. ATPA. Standards for Tests and Measurements in Physical Therapy Practice. Phys. Ther. 1991; 71: 589-622
3. Arena JG, Bruno GM, Brucks AG, Searle JR, Sherman RA, Meador KJ. Reliability of an ambulatory electromyographic activity device for musculoskeletal disorders. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994; 17: 153-157
4. Bak P, Smolenski U, Schreiber U, Fröhlich A, Winkelmann C, Loth D. Diagnostische Wertigkeit von Oberflächen-EMG und einer visuellen Methode zur Beurteilung von menschlichen Bewegungsmustern am Beispiel der Hüftextension. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1998; 8: 84-91
5. Bak P. Untersuchung zur Reliabilität der Hüftextension mittels EMG-Polygraphie versus Videoanalyse. Vortrag 1. Mitteldeutsches Symposium. Jena: 1997
6. Benvenuti F, Mecacci R, Gineprari I, Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E, Ferrucci L, Baroni A, Rabuffetti M, Hallett M, Dambrosia JM, Stanhope SJ. Kinematic characteristics of standing disequilibrium: reliability and validity of a posturographic protocol. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1999; 80: 278-287
7. Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphine SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1992; 72: 1073-1080
8. Berglund K, Fugl-Meyer AR. Upper extremity function in hemiplegia: a cross validation study of two assessment methods. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 1986; 18: 155-157
9. Biefang S, Potthoff P, Schliehe F. Assessmentverfahren für die Rehabilitation. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie, 1999
10. Bogduk N. Musculoskeletal Pain: Toward precision diagnosis. In: Jensen TS, Turner JA, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 1997
11. Boline PD, Haas M, MeyerJJ, Kassak K, Nelson C, Keating JC Jr. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality: Part II. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 1993; 16: 363-374
12. Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Berlin: Springer, 1995
13. Braddom R. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Chicago: WB Saunders, 1996
14. Brennum J, Kjeldsen M, Jensen K, Jensen TS. Measurement of human pressure-pain thresholds on fingers and toes. Cephalgia 1989; 9, Suppl. 10: 131-132
15. Brockow T, Schreiber U, Smolenski U, Loth D, Unbehauen P, Callies R. Reliabilität und Objektivität der computergestützten Myotonometrie im Bereich der Lumbalmuskulatur. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1996; 6: 217-220
16. Buckup K. Klinische Tests an Knochen, Gelenken und Muskeln. Untersuchungen - Zeichen - Phänomene. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1995
17. Bulgheroni MV, Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Sandrini G, Nappi G, Pedotti A. A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans. Funct. Neurol. 1998; 13: 239-245
18. Carlson AM. Personality characteristics of patients with chronic pain in comparison with normal controls and depressed patients. Pain 1986; 25: 373-382
19. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys. Ther. 1985; 65: 175-178
20. Cole B, Finch E, Gowland C, Mayo N. Physical Rehabilitation outcome measures. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995
21. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J. Chron. Dis. 1986; 39: 897-906
22. Dittmar SS, Gresham GE (ed). Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation professional. Gaithersburg: Aspen, 1997
23. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994
24. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann. rheum. Dis. 1978; 37: 378-381
25. Duckworth M. Outcome Measurement Selection and Topology. Physiotherapy 1999; 85: 21-27
26. Duncan PW, Probst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensimotor revovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys. Ther. 1983; 63: 1606-1610
27. Ensink FB, Saur PM, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: influence of time or day and individual factors on measurements. Spine 1996; 21: 1339-1343
28. Frisch H. Programmierte Untersuchung des Bewegungsapparates (Chirodiagnostik). Berlin: Springer, 1994
29. Geissner E, Jungnitsch G. Psychologie des Schmerzes - Diagnose und Therapie. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union, 1992
30. Gracely RH. Studies of pain in normal man. In: Wall PD, Melzack R: Textbook of pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994
31. Gracovetsky SA, Newman NM, Richards MP, Asselin S, Lanzo VF, Marriott A. Evaluation of clinician and machine performance in the assessment of low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 568-575
32. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain. Spine 1991; 16: 1068-1974
33. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J. Chron. Dis. 1987; 40: 171-178
34. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann. Intern. Med. 1993; 118: 622-629
35. Haas BM, Bergstrom E, Jamous A, Bennie A. The inter-rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 560-564
36. Helewa A, Goldsmith C, Smythe H, Gibson E. An evaluation of four different measures of abdominal strength: patient, order and instrument variation. J. Rheumatol. 1990; 17: 965-969
37. Hoppenfield S. Untersuchung der Wirbelsäule und Extremitäten. Stuttgart: Fischer, 1994
38. Jain SS, DeLisa JA, Eyles MY, Nadler S, Kirshblum S, Smith A. Further experience in development of an objective structured clinical examination for physical medicine and rehabilitation residents. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1998; 77: 306-310
39. Jensen KJ, Andersen HO, Oleson J, Lindblom U. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain 1986; 25: 313-323
40. Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys. Ther. 1994; 74: 380-388
41. Johnston MV, Keith RA, Hinderer SR. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1992; 73, Suppl.: 3-23
42. Keitel W. Das Messen in der Rheumatologie - Probleme der Standardisierung und Verläßlichkeit. Akt. Rheumatol. 1988; 13: 43-46
43. Kelemen J, Eichhorn M, Ovenhausen K, Lorensen W, Müller W. Reliabilitäts- und Validitätsstudien mit dem Triflexometer, eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung von Form und Beweglichkeit der Wirbelsäule. Rehabilitation (Stuttg.) 1998; 37: 78-84
44. King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys.Ther. 1998; 78: 852-866
45. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J. Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27-36
46. Kochersberger G, McConnell E, Kuchibhatta MN, Pieper C. The reliability, validity, and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1996; 77: 793-795
47. Kröling P, Kober L Ein automatisiertes Verfahren zur Druckschmerzschwellenbestimmung (Pressure Algometrie) am Beispiel der Wirkung von Eisbeutel und Kaltluft. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1994; 4: 173-176
48. Lantz CA, Chen J, Buch D. Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion. Spine 1999; 24: Manuskript im Druck, mit freundlicher Genehmigung vom Autor
49. Lawton MP. The functional assessment of elderly. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1971; 19: 465-491
50. Lienert GA, Raatz U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags-Union, 1994
51. Lowen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78-81
52. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Inter. J. Rehabil. Res. 1981; 4: 483-492
53. Margolis RB, Chibnall JT, Tait RC. Test-retest reliability of the pain drawing instrument. Pain 1988; 33: 49-51
54. Matthesius RG, Jochheim K-A, Barolin GS, Heinz C. Internationale Klassifikation der Schädigungen, Fähigkeitsstörungen und Beeinträchtigungen. Berlin: Ullstein Mosby, 1995
55. Mayer TG, Smith SS, Kondraske G, Gatchell RJ, Carmichel TW, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function, Part 3: Preliminary data on isokinetic torso rotation testing with myoelectric spectral analysis in normal and low back pain subjects. Spine 1985; 10: 912-920
56. McGuire DB. The measurement of clinical pain. Nurs. Res. 1984; 33: 152-156
57. Miller SA, Mayer T, Cox R, Gatchel RJ. Reliability problems associated with the modified Schober techniques for true lumbar flexion measurement. Spine 1992; 17: 345-348
58. Myers RS. Saunders Manual of Physical Therapy Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995
59. Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisted: implications to prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlov AR (ed): Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington: National Academic Press, 1991
60. Ng JK, Richardson CA. Reliability of electromyographic power spectral analysis of back muscle endurance in healthy subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1996; 77: 259-264
61. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1995
62. Nussbaum EL, Downes L. Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days. Phys Ther. 1998; 78: 160-169
63. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds, clinical assessment and differential diagnosis: reliability and validity in patients with myogenic pain. Pain 1989; 37: 257-263
64. Peach JP, Gunning J, McGill SM. Reliability of spectral EMG parameters of healthy back extensors during submaximum isometric fatiguing contractions and recovery. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 1998; 8: 403-410
65. Platz T, Prass K, Denzler P, Bock S, Mauritz KH. Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high-functioning stroke patients: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1999; 80: 270-277
66. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1988; 69: 195-197
67. Portek I, Paercey MJ, Reader GP, Mowat AP. Correlations between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br.J. Rheumatol. 1983; 22: 197-205
68. Ransford AO, Cairns D, Mooney V. The pain drawing as an aid to the psychologic evaluation of patients with low back pain. Spine 1976; 1: 127-134
69. Rauhala E, Erkinjuntti M, Polo O. Detection of periodic leg movements with a static-charge-sensitive bed. J. Sleep Res. 1996; 5: 246-250
70. Reeves JR, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB. Reliability of pressure algometer as a measure of the myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain 1986; 24: 313-321
71. Richter T, Lawall J. Zur Zuverlässigkeit manualdiagnostischer Befunde. Man. Med. 1993; 31: 1-11
72. Schmidt KL, Drexel H, Jochheim K-A. Lehrbuch der Physikalischen Medizin und Rehabilitation. Stuttgart: Fischer, 1995
73. Schneider W. Rehabilitation Schweiz 1998. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 1998; 79: 2683-2688
74. Schöps P, Seichert N, Schenk M, Petri U, Senn E. Alters- und geschlechtsspezifische Bewegungsausmaße der Halswirbelsäule. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1997; 7: 80-87
75. Schreiber TU, Grimme A. Reliability and pressure-velocity characteristics of computerized pressure-algometer. Wien: 9th World Congress on Pain, 1999
76. Schreiber TU, Brockow T, Smolenski U. Assessment of Cervical Spine Function using a 3D-Motion Analyzing System. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1997; 78: 1023
77. Schreiber TU, Brockow T, Kaufhold A, Scholz K, Goldhahn S, Smolenski U. Coupling patterns of lumbar spine and pelvic in low back pain patients measured by computerized 3-dimensional motion analysis. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C: The Integrated Function of the Lumar Spine and Sacroiliac Joint. San Diego: 1995: 834
78. Schuck P, Müller H, Resch K-L. Designs und Statistiken zur Ermittlung der Veränderungssensitivität. In: 8. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium. Reha-Bedarf - Effektivität - Ökonomie. Frankfurt: DRV-Schriften, Band 12, 1999
79. Schuntermann MF (Hrsg). ICIDH-2 Internationale Klassifikation der Schäden, Aktivitäten und Partizipation. Beta-1 Entwurf zur Erprobung. Frankfurt am Main: Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger, 1998
80. Smolenski UC, Endres G, Schreiber TU. 3dimensionale Bewegungsfunktionsanalyse der Halswirbelsäule mit dem System zebris - Standardisierung der Untersuchungsbedingungen. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1998; 8: 22-24
81. Spieker S, Boose A, Breit S, Dichgans J. Long-term measurement of tremor. Mov. Disord. 1998; 13: 81-84
82. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys.Ther. 1996; 76: 1109-1123
83. Stucki G, Stucki S, Sangha O. Modell der Krankheitsauswirkungen und Begriffsdefinition. Z. Rheumatol. 1997; 56: 245-254
84. Stucki G, Stucki S, Sangha O. Patientenzentrierte Evaluation der Krankheitsauswirkungen bei muskuloskelettalen Erkrankungen: Auswahl und Testung von Outcome-Instrumenten. Z. Rheumatol. 1997; 56: 255-265
85. Suzuki N, Endo S. A quantitative study of trunk muscle strength and fatigue in the low back syndrome. Spine 1983; 8: 69-74
86. Thapa PB, Gideon P, Brockman KG, Fought RL, Ray WA. Clinical and biomechanical measures of balance as fall predictors in ambulatory nursing home residents. J. Gerontol. Biol. Med. Sci. 1996; 51: M239-M246
87. Trimm KE, Gennrich P, Burns R, Fyke D. The mechanical and physiological performance reliability of selected isokinetic dynamometers. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 1992; 2: 182-190
88. Van Deusen J, Brunt D. Assessment in Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997
89. Veiersted KB. Reliability of myoelectric trapezius muscle in repetitive light work. Ergonomics 1996; 39: 797-807
90. Vogel HP. Diagnostische Maßnahmen in der klinischen Neurologie. Stuttgart: Hippokrates, 1991
91. Vogt L, Bernhardt M, Banzer W. Kinematische und neuromuskulare Untersuchung der Lumbalregion beim Gehen auf dem Laufbandergometer mit und ohne Steigung. Sportverl. Sportschaden 1998; 12: XV-XXII
92. Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen DH. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys. Ther. 1987; 67: 1342-1347
93. Werner GT, Klimczyk K, Rude J. Checkliste Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1997
94. Wilkie D, Lovejoy N, Dodd M, Tesler M. Cancer pain measurement: concurrent validity of three tools. Hospice Journal 1990; 6 (1): 1-13
95. Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys. Ther. 1993; 73: 25-37
96. WorleyJS, Harmon N, Miller GJ, Hollis SB, Harlow S, Briggs V. Reliability of potential clinical measures of muscle tone in the elbows of patients after stroke. Am. J. Occup.Ther. 1996; 50: 554-560
97. Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurement of cervical spine range of motion: Comparison of three different methods. Phys. Ther. 1991; 71: 98-104