Screening Eucalyptus clones for salt tolerance

HortScience

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 867-870

  Grieve, C M ^a   Guzy, M R ^a   Poss, J A ^a   Shannon, M C ^a  

^a U S SALINITY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agroforestry; Biomass production; Coppicing; Drainage water reuse; E. rudis; Eucalyptus camaldulensis; Relative growth rate; Salinity; Sulfate dominated irrigation waters

Indexed keywords

CLONE; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT METABOLISM; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; SODIUM SULFATE; STRESS TOLERANCE; WASTE WATER RECYCLING;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS CAMALDULENSIS; EUCALYPTUS RUDIS;

EID: 0032859761     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.34.5.867     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, J.A., J.L. Chambers, and M. Stine. 1994. Prospects for increasing the salt tolerance of forest trees: A review. Tree Physiol. 14:843-853.
2. Allender, E.B. 1990. Tree species for woodlots -Existing cultivars, p. 18-22. In: Proc. Woodlots Wkshp., Ser. No. 32, compiled by Mark Dale, Mildura Function Centre, Dept. of Agr. Rural Affairs, Australia.
3. Bell, D.T., P.G. van der Moezel, I.J. Bennett, J.A. McComb, C.F. Wilkins, S.C.B. Marshall, and A.L. Morgan. 1993. Comparisons of growth of Eucalyptus camaldulensis from seeds and tissue culture: Root, shoot and leaf morphology of 9-month-old plants grown in deep sand and sand over clay. For. Ecol. Mgt. 57:125-139.
4. Blake, T.J. 1981. Salt tolerance of eucalypt species grown in saline solution culture. Austral. For. Res. 11:179-183.
5. Cervinka, V. 1994. Agroforestry farming system for the management of selenium and salt on irrigated farmland, p. 237-250. In: W. Frankenberger, Jr. and S. Benson (eds.). Selenium in the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York.
6. Dell, B. 1995. Diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies in eucalypts, p. 417-440. In: P.M. Attiwill and M.A. Adams (eds.). Nutrition of eucalypts. Cmwlth. Sci. Ind. Res. Council, Div. of Soils, Collingwood VIC, Australia.
7. Donaldson, D.R., J.K. Hasey, and W.B. Davis. 1983. Eucalyptus out-perform other species in salty, flooded soils. Calif. Agr. 37(9&10):20-21.
8. Dunn, G.M., D.W. Taylor, M.R. Nester, and T.B. Beetson. 1994. Performance of twelve selected Australian tree species on a saline site in southeast Queensland. For. Ecol. Mgt. 70:255-264.
9. Eldridge, K., J. Davidson, C. Harwood, and G. van Wyk. 1993. Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. Farrell, R.C.C., D.T. Bell, K. Akilan, and J.K. Marshall. 1996a. Morphological and physiological comparisons of clonal lines of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. I. Responses to drought and waterlogging. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 23:497-507.
11. Farrell, R.C.C., D.T. Bell, K. Akilan, and J.K. Marshall. 1996b. Morphological and physiological comparisons of clonal lines of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Responses to waterlogging/salinity and alkalinity. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 23:509-518.
12. Grieve, C.M. and M.C. Shannon. 1999. Ion accumulation and distribution in shoot components of salt-stressed eucalyptus clones. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Soc. 124:559-563.
13. James, S.A. and D.T. Bell. 1995. Morphology and anatomy of leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis clones: Variation between geographically separated locations. Austral. J. Bot. 43:415-433.
14. Low, C.B., G.H. Matson, and R.M. Sachs. 1983. Propagating fast-growing eucalypts for energy crops. Calif. Agr. 37(5&6):20-21.
15. Marcar, N.E. 1989. Salt tolerance of frost-resistant eucalypts. New For. 3:141-149.
16. Marcar, N.E. and D. Crawford. 1996. Tree-growing strategies for the productive use of saline land. Austral. J. Soil Water Conserv. 9:34-40.
17. Marcar, N.E., K.G. Eldridge, V.J. Hartney, and B.J. Myers. 1990. Tree species for woodlots: Future cultivars, p. 23-30. In: Proc. Woodlots Wkshp., Ser. No. 32. Mildura Function Centre, Dept. Agr. Rural Affairs, Victoria, Australia.
18. Myers, R.H. 1990. Classical and modern regression with applications. Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif.
19. Poorter, H. 1989. Plant growth analysis: Towards a synthesis of the classical and the functional approach. Physiol. Plant. 75:237-244.
20. Rhoades, J.D. 1989. Intercepting, isolating, and reusing drainage waters for irrigation to conserve water and protect water quality. Agr. Water Mgt. 16:37-52.
21. Sands, R. 1981. Salt resistance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. from three different seed sources. Austral. For. Res. 11:93-100.
22. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program. 1990. A management plan for agricultural subsurface drainage and related problems on the westside San Joaquin Valley. Final Report. E.A. Imhoff, Mgr., Calif. Dept. Water Resources. Sept. 1990.
23. SAS Institute. SAS user's guide: Statistics. 1985. ver. 5. Proc NLIN. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
24. Shannon, M.C. and C.M. Grieve. 1999. Options for using poor-quality water for vegetable crops. HortScience. (In press.)
25. Thomson, L.A.J. 1988. Salt tolerance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and related species. PhD Diss., Univ. of Melbourne, Australia. (Cited in Allen et al., 1994.)
26. Thornley, J.H.M. 1990. A new formulation of the logistic growth equation and its application to leaf area growth. Ann. Bot. 66:309-311.
27. van der Moezel, P.G., G.V.N. Pearce-Pinto, and D.T. Bell. 1991. Screening for salt and waterlogging tolerance in Eucalyptus and Melaleuca species. For. Ecol. Mgt. 40:27-37.
28. Van Genuchten, M. Th. and G.J. Hoffman. 1984. Analysis of crop salt tolerance data. p. 258-271. In: I. Shainberg and J. Shalhevet (eds.). Soil salinity under irrigation: Processes and management. Ecol. Studies 51. Springer-Verlag, New York.