Attack by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) following spacing of mature lodgepole pine (Pinaceae) stands

Canadian Entomologist

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 671-685

  Safranyik, L ^a   Shore, T L ^a   Linton, D A ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARK; FORESTRY POLICY; PEST DAMAGE;

ANIMALIA; COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS MURRAYANAE; DENDROCTONUS VALENS; HYLURGOPS; HYLURGOPS POROSUS; ORTHOTOMICUS CAELATUS; PINACEAE; PINUS CONTORTA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 0032859583     PISSN: 0008347X     EISSN: 19183240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4039/Ent131671-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amman GD. 1989. Why partial cutting in lodgepole pine stands reduces losses to mountain pine beetle. pp. 48-59 in GD Amman (Compiler), Proceedings of a Symposium on the Management of Lodgepole Pine to Minimize Losses to the Mountain Pine Beetle, 12-14 July 1988, Kalispell, Montana. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-262
2. Braumandl TF, Curran MP (compilers). 1992. A field guide for site identification and interpretation for the Nelson Forest Region. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Land Management Handbook 20
3. Bright DE, Jr. 1976. The bark beetles of Canada and Alaska. Coleoptera: Scolytidae. Canada Department of Agriculture, Biosystematic Research Institute, Research Branch Publication 1526
4. Cole DM, McGregor MD. 1985. Silvicultural practices for lodgepole pine stands in commercial forests, pp. 47-56 in MD McGregor, DM Cole (Eds.), Integrating management strategies for the mountain pine beetle with multiple-resource management of lodgepole pine forests. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-174
5. Colwell RK, Coddington JA. 1994. Estimating territorial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 345: 101-18
6. Derman C, Gleser LJ, Olkin I. 1973. A Guide to Probability Theory and Application. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Wilson, Inc.
7. Frontier S. 1985. Diversity and structure in aquatic ecosystems. pp. 253-312 in M Barnes (Ed.), Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press
8. Furniss RL, Carolyn VM. 1977. Western forest insects. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 1339
9. Heck KL, van Belle G, Siberloff D. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56:1459-61
10. Keen FP. 1952. Insect enemies of western forests. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 273
11. Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press
12. Mitchell JL. 1994. Commercial thinning of mature lodgepole pine to reduce susceptibility to mountain pine beetle. Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, FRDA Report 224
13. Mitchell RG, Waring RH, Pitman GB. 1983. Thinning lodgepole pine increases tree vigor and resistance to mountain pine beetle. Forest Science 29: 204-11
14. Ramsey CB (editor). 1998. Stand Density Management: Planning and Implementation, Conference Proceedings. 6-7 Nov. 1997, Edmonton
15. Safranyik L, Morrison D. 1998. Stand protection issues in thinning. pp. 84-91 in CR Ramsey (Ed.), Stand Density Management: Planning and Implementation, Conference Proceedings, 6-7 Nov. 1997, Edmonton
16. Southwood TRE. 1978. Ecological Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall
17. Waring RH, Pitman GB. 1985. Modifying lodgepole pine stands to change susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack. Ecology 66: 889-97
18. Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science (Washington, D.C.) 147: 250-60
19. Wood SL. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 6