Enhanced solution control for physically and geometrically non-linear problems. Part II - Comparative performance analysis

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 205-230

  Geers, M G D ^a,b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL MILITARY ACADEMY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Arc length control; Automated solution control; Geometrically and physically non linear analyses; Subplane method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

ARC-LENGTH CONTROL; PATH FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES; SUBPLANE CONTROL METHODS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NON-LINEAR SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURE; TRUSS;

EID: 0032857289     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990920)46:2<205::AID-NME669>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ramm E. Strategies for tracing the nonlinear response near limit points. In Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics, Wunderlich W. et al (eds). Springer. Berlin, 1981; 63-89.
2. Clarke MJ, Hancock GJ. A study of incremental-iterative strategies for non-linear analyses. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1990; 29:1365-1391.
3. Widjaja BR. Path-following technique based on residual energy suppression for nonlinear finite element analysis. Computers and Structures 1998; 66(2-3):201-209.
4. Schellekens JCJ, Feenstra PH, de Borst R. A self-adaptive load estimator based on strain energy. In Computational Plasticity, Fundamentals and Applications, Owen DRJ, Onate E, Hinton E (eds). CIMNE: Barcelona, Pineridge Press, 1992; 187-198.
5. Bellini PX, Chulya A. An improved automatic incremental algorithm for the efficient solution of non-linear finite element equations. Computers and Structures 1987; 26(1/2):99-110.
6. Forde BWR, Stiemer SF. Improved arc-length orthogonality methods for nonlinear finite element analysis. Computers and Structures 1987; 27(5):625-630.
7. Feenstra PH, Schellekens JCJ. Self-adaptive solution algorithm for a constrained Newton-Raphson method. Technical Report 25.2-91-2-13, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1991.
8. Magnusson A, Svensson I. Numerical treatment of complete load-deflection curves, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 41:955-971.
9. Powell G, Simons J. Improved iteration strategy for nonlinear structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1981; 17:1455-1467.
10. Bathe K, Dvorkin EN. On the automatic solution of non-linear finite element equations. Computers and Structures 1983; 17(5-6):871-879.
11. Yang Y, Shieh M. Solution method for nonlinear problems with multiple critical points. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 1990; 28(12):2110-2116.
12. Schweizerhof KH, Wriggers P. Consistent linearization for path following methods in nonlinear FE analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1986; 59:261-279.
13. Qi Z, Tianqi Y. The adaptive parameter incremental method for the analysis of snapping problems. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 1995; 16(9):851-858.
14. Chen H, Blandford GE. Work-increment-control method for non-linear analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1993; 36:909-930.
15. Chen Z, Schreyer HL. A numerical solution scheme for softening problems involving total strain control. Computers and Structures 1990; 37(6):1043-1050.
16. Chen Z, Schreyer HL. Secant structural solution strategies under element constraint for incremental damage. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1991; 90:869-884.
17. Crisfield MA. An arc-length method including line searches and accelerations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1983; 19:1269-1289.
18. Napoleão J, Elwi FE, Murray DW. An eigenvector-based strategy for the analysis of inelastic structures. Computers and Structures 1992; 42(5):833-848.
19. Crisfield MA. A fast incremental-iterative solution procedure that handles snap-through. Computers and Structures 1981; 13(1/3):55-62.
20. Lee S, Manuel FS, Rossow EC. Large deflections and stability of elastic frames. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 1968; 94(2):521-547.
21. Geers MGD, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Peerlings RHJ. Validation and internal length scale determination for a gradient damage model: application to short glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1998b; 36(17):2557-2583.
22. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD. Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of concrete fracture. Mechanics Cohesive-Frictions Materials 1998; 3:323-342.
23. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree JHP. Gradient-enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1996; 39:3391-3403.
24. Brekelmans WAM. Nonlocal formulation of the evolution of damage in a one-dimensional configuration. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1993; 30(11):1503-1512.
25. de Borst R, Mühlhaus HB. Gradient-dependent plasticity: formulation and algorithmic aspects. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 35:521-539.
26. de Borst R, Pamin J, Peerlings RHJ, Sluys LJ. On gradient-enhanced damage and plasticity models for failure in quasi-brittle and frictional materials. Computational Mechanics 1995; 17:130-141.
27. Geers MGD, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Peerlings RHJ. Strain-based transient-gradient damage model for failure analyses. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998a; 160(1-2): 133-154.
28. c methods for polymers. Polymer Testing 1990; 9: 15-26.
29. Mazars J. Application de la mécanique de l'endommagement au comportement non linéaire et à la rupture du béton de structure. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris VI, Paris, France, 1984.
30. Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G. Continuum damage theory - application to concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1989; 115(2):345-365.
31. Bažant ZP, Pfeiffer PA. Shear fracture test of concrete. Materials and Structures (RILEM) 1986; 110(19):111-121.
32. Ingraffea AR, Panthaki MJ. Analysis of shear fracture tests of concrete beams. In Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures. ASCE: Tokyo, 1985; 151-173.
33. Rots JG, Kusters GMA, Blauwendraad J. Strain-softening simulations of mixed-mode concrete failure. In Proceedings SEM/RILEM International Conference on Fracture of Concrete and Rock, Shah SP, Swartz SE (eds). Springer: New York, 1987; 175-189.
34. Schlangen E. Experimental and numerical analysis of fracture processes in concrete. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1993.
35. Geers MGD, de Borst R, Peerlings RHJ. Damage analysis of notched concrete beams loaded in four-point-shear. In Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Proceedings of FRAMCOS-3, Mihashi H, Rokugo K (eds). vol. 2. AEDIFICATIO Publishers, 1998; 981-992.
36. Bergan PG. Automated incremental-iterative solution methods in structural mechanics. In Recent Advances in Non-Linear Computational Mechanics, Hinton E. et al. (eds). Chapter 2. Pineridge Press: Swansea, U.K., 1982; 41-62.