Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 107-109

  Marasovic D ^a   Vuksic I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SPLIT   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Balsam of Peru; Fragrance mix; Leg ulcer; Medicaments; Sodium fusidate

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; BACITRACIN; BALSAM PERU; BENZOCAINE; BENZOYL PEROXIDE; CHLORAMPHENICOL; DRUG; ETHACRIDINE LACTATE; ETHYLENEDIAMINE; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; FUSIDATE SODIUM; GENTAMICIN; HEXACHLOROPHENE; LANOLIN; MACROGOL; NEOMYCIN; NITROFURAL; OXYTETRACYCLINE; PETROLATUM; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; POVIDONE IODINE; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; PSEUDOMONIC ACID; ROSIN; THIOMERSAL;

ARTICLE; DRUG SENSITIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEG ULCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; SKIN ALLERGY;

EID: 0032855404     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06242.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1. Bandmann H J, Calnan C D, Cronin E et al. Dermatitis from applied medicaments. Arch Dermatol 1972: 106: 335-337.
2. 2. Baker S R, Stacey M C, Jop-McKoy A G, Hoskin S E, Thompson P J. Epidemiology of chronic venous ulcers. Br J Surg 1991: 78: 864-867.
3. 3. Ryan T J, Wilkinson D S. Diseases of the veins and arteries. Leg ulcers. In: Rook A, Wilkinson D S, Ebling F J G, Champion R H, Burton J L, (eds): Textbook of dermatology, 4th edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986: 1187-1227.
4. 4. Guillaume J C. Treatment of venous ulcer of the leg. Recommendations of the Conference of Experts, Oslo 1995. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1997: 124: 360-364.
5. 5. Eaglstein W H, Falanga V. Chronic wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1997: 77: 689-700.
6. 6. Rudzki E, Baranowska E. Contact sensitivity in stasis dermatitis. Dermatologica 1974: 148: 353-356.
7. 7. Malten K E, Kuiper J P, Van Der Staak W.B.J.M. Contact allergic investigations in 100 patients with ulcus cruris. Dermatologica 1973: 147: 241-254.
8. 8. Rademaker M, Wood B, Greig D E. Multiple medicament allergies in two patients with chronic leg ulceration. Australas J Dermatol 1996: 37: 151-152.
9. 9. Malten K E, Kuiper J P, Van der Staak W B J M. Contact allergic investigations in 100 patients with ulcus cruris. Dermatologica 1973: 147: 241-254.
10. 10. Fisher A A, Pascher F, Kanof N. Allergic contact dermatitis due to ingredients of vehicles. A "vehicle tray" for patch testing. Arch Dermatol 1971: 104: 286-290.
11. 11. Stipić V. Jatrogene kożne manifestacije u dječjoj dobi. Anali opće bolnice u Splitu 1983: 9: 97-105.
12. 12. Dooms-Goosens A, Degreef H, Parijs M, Kerkofs L A. A retrospective study of patch test results from 163 patients with stasis dermatitis or leg ulcers (I). Discusion of the patch test results and the sensitization indices and determination of the relevance of positive reactions. Dermatologica 1979: 159: 93-100.
13. 13. Wakelin S H, Coooper S, Marren P, Shaw S. Sorbitan mono-oleate: a potential allergen in paste bandages. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 377.
14. 14. Ċajkovac V. Perkutana resorpcija lijekova s obzirom na različite podloge. Farmaceutski glasnik 1970: 26: 309-316.
15. 15. Kulozik M, Powell S M, Cherry G, Ryan T J. Contact sensitivity in community-based leg ulcer patients. Clin Exp Dermatol 1987: 13: 82-84.
16. 16. Angelini G, Rantucio F, Meneghini C L. Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 81-87.
17. 17. Wilson C L, Cameron J, Powell S M, Cherry G, Ryan T J. High incidence of contact dermatitis in leg ulcer patients -implications for management. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990: 16: 250-253.
18. 18. Angelini G, Veǹa G A, Meneghini C L. Allergic contact dermatitis to some medicaments. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 12: 263-269.
19. 19. Moss C, Friedman P S, Shuster S, Simpson J M. Susceptibility and amplification of sensitivity in contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Immunol 1985: 61: 232-241.
20. 20. Dekaris D. Temeljna alergologija. Kako nastaju imunološke bolesti. Zagreb: Ṡkolska knjiga, 1983: 140-143.
21. 21. Bahmer F A, Lesch H. Density of Langerhans cells in ATP-ase stained epidermal sheet preparations from stasis dermatitis skin of the lower leg. Acta Derm Venerol 1987: 67: 301-304.
22. 22. MacDonald R M, Beck M. Neomycin. A review with particular reference to dermatologic usage. Clin Exp Dermatol 1983: 8: 249-258.
23. 23. Fraji J E, Peltonen L, Hopu Havu V K. Allergy to various components of topical preparations in stasis dermatitis and leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 97-100.
24. 24. Rudzki E, Zakrzewski Z, Rebandel P, Grzywa Z, Hudymowicz. Cross reactions between aminoglycoside antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 314-316.
25. 25. Baptista A, Barros M A. Contact dermatitis from sodium fusidate. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 186-187.
26. 26. Agathos M, Bandmann H J. Benzoyl peroxide contact allergy in leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 316-317.
27. 27. Jensen O, Petersen S H, Vesteroger L. Contact sensitization to benzoyl peroxide following topical treatment of chronic leg ulcer. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 179-182.
28. 28. Mitchell J G. Contact dermatitis from proflavine dihydrochloride. Arch Dermatol 1972: 106: 294-296.
29. 29. Kudo H, Takahashi K, Suzuki Y Y, Tanaka T, Myachi Y, Imamura S. Contact dermatitis from compound mixture of sugar and povidone iodine. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 155-157.
30. 30. Breit R. Allergen change in stasis dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 309-311.
31. 31. Curley R K, Macfarlane A W, King C M. Contact sensitivity to the amideanesthetics lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacine. Arch Dermatol 1986: 122: 924-926.
32. 32. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
33. 33. Maucher O M. Beitrag zur Kreuz-oder Kopplugsallergic auf parahydroxybenzoesaureester. Berufsdermatosen 1974: 22: 183-187.