Comparing the preferences of three herbivore species with resistance traits of 15 perennial dicots: The effects of phylogenetic constraints

Plant Ecology

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 141-152

  Hendriks, Rob J J ^a   De Boer, Nico J ^b   Van Groenendael, Jan M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Deroceras reticulatum; Locusta migratoria; Multiple choice tests; Phylogenetic correction; Plant palatability; Spodoptera exigua

Indexed keywords

ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE; HERBIVORY; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; PALATABILITY; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHYLOGENETICS;

DEROCERAS RETICULATUM; LOCUSTA MIGRATORIA; SPODOPTERA EXIGUA;

EID: 0032854051     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009832621516     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. An-Ming, L. 1990. A preliminary cladistic study of the families of the superorder Lamiiflorae. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 103: 39-57.
2. Baas, W. J. 1989. Secondary plant compounds, their ecological significance and consequences for the carbon budget. Pp. 313-340. In: Lambers, H., Cambridge, M. L., Konings, H. & Pons, T. L. (eds), Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, The Netherlands.
3. Baldwin, I. T. & Schultz, J. C. 1983. Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221: 277-279.
4. Baldwin, I. T. 1990. Herbivory simulations in ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 91-93.
5. Berenbaum, M. R. 1995. The chemistry of defense: Theory and practice. Proceedings of the National Acad. Sci. USA 2: 2-8.
6. Bernays, E. A., Chapman, R. F., Macdonald, J. & Salter, J. E. R. 1976. The degree of oligophagy in Locusta migratoria (L.). Ecol. Entomol. 1: 223-230.
7. Bryant, J. P., Chapin III, F. S. & Klein, D. R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40: 357-368.
8. Chase M. W., Soltis D. E., Olmstead R. G., Morgan D., Les D. H., Mishler B. D., Duvall M. R., Price R. A., Hills H. G., Qiu Y.-L., Kron K. A., Rettig J. H., Conti E., Palmer J. D., Manhart J. R., Sytsma K. J., Michaels H. J., Kress W. J., Karol K. G., Clark W. D., Hedrén M., Gaut B. S., Jansen R. K., Kim K.-J., Wimpee C. F., Smith J. F., Rurnier G. R., Strauss S. H., Xiang Q.-Y., Plunkett G. M., Soltis P. S., Swensen S. M., Williams S. E., Gadek P. A., Quinn C. J., Eguiarte L. E., Golenberg E., Learn G. H., Jr., Graham S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan S. & Albert V. A. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 80: 528-580.
9. Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899.
10. Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
11. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
12. Fisher, R. A. 1920. Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on 'The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Ann. Appl. Biol. 7: 372-376.
13. Folgarait, P. J. & Davidson, D. W. 1995. Myrmecophytic Cecropia: Antiherbivore defenses under different nutrient treatments. Oecologia 104: 189-206.
14. Futuyma, D. J. & Mitter, C. 1996. Insect-plant interactions: the evolution of component communities. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B351: 1361-1366.
15. Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. Agricultural Handbook No. 379, USDA, Washington DC, USA.
16. Grime, J. P. & Hunt, R. 1975. Relative growth-rate; its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J. Ecol. 63: 393-422.
17. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111: 1169-1194.
18. Grime, J. P., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Thompson, K. & Thompson, K. 1996. Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves. Oikos 77: 489-494.
19. Groenendael, J. M. van, Klimeš, L., Klimeš, J. & Hendriks, R. J. J. 1996. Comparative ecology of clonal plants. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B351: 1331-1339.
20. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel M. 1991. The evolutionary method in comparative biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F. & Nee, S. 1995a.. Why ecologists need to be phylogenetically challenged. J. Ecol. 83: 535-536.
22. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F. & Nee, S. 1995b.. Further remarks on the role of phylogeny in comparative ecology. J. Ecol. 83: 735-736.
23. Hegi, G. 1990-1995. Illustrierte Flora van Mitteleuropa. Blackwell Wissenschafts Verlag, Berlin.
24. Hegnauer, R. & Hegnauer, M. 1962-1992. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen: eine Übersicht über die Verbreitung und die systematsche Bedeutung der Pflanzenstoffe. 10 volumes. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.
25. Herms, D. A. & Mattson, W. J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or to defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67: 283-335.
26. Hochuli, D. F. 1993. Does silica defend grasses against invertebrate herbivores? Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 418.
27. Jansen, R. K., Holsinger, K. E., Michaels, H. J. & Palmer, J. D. 1990. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site data at higher taxonomic levels: An example from the Asteraceae. Evolution 44: 2089-2105.
28. Jermy, T., Hanson, F. E. & Dethier, V. G. 1968. Induction of specific food preference in lepidopterous larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11: 211-230.
29. Jong, T. J. de 1995. Why fast-growing plants do not bother about defence. Oikos 74: 545-548.
30. Meijden, E. van der, Wijn, M. & Verkaar, H. J. 1988. Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51: 355-363.
31. Meijden, R. van der 1990. Heukels' Flora van Nederland. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
32. Pagel, M. 1993. Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure. J. Theor. Biol. 164: 191-205.
33. Painter, R. H. 1951. Insect resistance in crop plants. Macmillan, New York.
34. Peterson, C. H. & Renaud, P. E. 1989. Analysis of feeding preference experiments. Oecologia 80: 82-86.
35. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11: 247-251.
36. Ricklefs, R. E. 1996. Phylogeny and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 229-230.
37. Risch, S. J. 1985. Effects of induced chemical changes on interpretation of feeding preference tests. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39: 81-84.
38. Roa, R. 1992. Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments. Oecologia 89: 509-515.
39. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT users guide, version 6, fourth edition, volume 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 846 pp.
40. Schoonhoven, D. M., Blaney, W. M. & Simmonds, M. S. J. 1987. Inconstancies of chemoreceptor sensitivities. In: Labevrie, V., Fabres, G. & Lachaise, D. (eds), Insects-Plants. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
41. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. Silvertown, J. & Dodd, M. 1996. Comparing plants and connecting traits. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B351: 1233-1239.
43. Simms, E. L. 1992. Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. Pp. 363-391. In: Fritz, R. S. & Simms, E. L. (eds), Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
44. Smits, P. H. 1987. Nuclear polyhedrosis virus as biological control agent of Spodoptera exigua. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
45. South, A. 1992. Terrestrial slugs: biology, ecology and control. Chapman and Hall, London.
46. Usher, B. F., Bernays, E. A. & Barbehenn, R. V. 1988. Antifeedant tests with larvae of Pseudaletia unipuncta: variation of behavioral response. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48: 203-212.
47. Vicari, M. & Bazely, D. R. 1993. Do grasses fight back? The case for antiherbivore defences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 137-141.
48. Ward, L. K., Hackshaw, A. & Clarke, R. T. 1995. Food-plant families of British insects and mites: the influence of life form and plant family. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 55: 109-127.
49. Westoby, M., Leishman, M. R. & Lord, J. M. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B351: 1309-1318.