Conflict over natural resource management: A social indicator based on analysis of online news media text

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 493-500

  Bengston, David N ^a   Fan, David P ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Content analysis; National forest; Natural; News media; Resource management; Social indicator; Usda forest service

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; MEDIA ROLE; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032848671     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089419299279560     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bass, R. 1996. Field truths: A walk in the woods shows that “salvage logging” is just another way to cut and run. Sierra 81(4):28-30, 60-61.
2. Bengston, D. N., and D. P. Fan. 1997. Evolving attitudes toward ecosystem management in the United States. Paper presented at the 59th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, December 7-10, Milwaukee, WI.
3. Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Fan, D. P. 1988. Predictions of public opinion from the mass media: Computer content analysis and mathematical modeling. New York: Greenwood Press.
5. Fan, D. P. and D. N. Bengston. 1997. Public debates shaping forestry’s future: An analysis. Report prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Office of Communications, Washington, DC. (Copies available from North Central Research Station, 1992 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, USA, or from the following URL: http://www.ncfes.umn.edu/pubs/media_analysis/contents.html).
6. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, July 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Gerlach, L. P., and D. N. Bengston. 1994. If ecosystem management is the solution, what’s the problem? Eleven challenges for ecosystem management. J. Forestry 92(8):18-21.
8. Gongla-Coppinger, L., ed. 1996. LEXIS-NEXIS Directory of Online Services, 1996 Edition.Dayton, OH: Reed Elsevier.
9. Hays, S. P. 1987. Beauty, health, and permanence: Environmental politics in the United States, 1955-1985. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hirt, P. W. 1994. A conspiracy of optimism: management of the national forests since World War Two. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
11. Jones, J. R., R. Martin, and E. T. Bartlett. 1995. Ecosystem management: The U.S. Forest Service’s response to social confiict. Society Nat. Resources 8(2):161-168.
12. Miller, M. M. 1997. Frame mapping and analysis of news coverage of contentious issues. Soc.
13. Sci. Comput. Rev. 15(4):367-378.
14. Moore, M. P. 1993. Constructing irreconcilable confi ict: The function of synecdoche in the spotted owl controversy. Commun. Monogr. 60:258-274.
15. Orenstein, R. M., ed. 1996. Fulltext sources online. Vol. 8, Issue 2, July. Needham Heights, MA: BiblioData.
16. Steen, H. K. 1991. The beginning of the national forest system. Publication FS-488. Washington, DC: USDAForest Service.
17. Walker, G. B., and S. E. Daniels. 1996. The Clinton Administration, the Northwest Forest Conference, and managing confi ict: When talk and structure collide. Society Nat. Resources 9(1)77-91.