Disability and health care expenditure data: A wide range of user experience is more important than standard definitions of disability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 382-384

  Joslyn, Erica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUFFOLK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 0032847603     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096382899297503     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. DeJong G, Batavia A, Griss R. America's neglected health minority: working-age persons with disabilities. Milbank Quarterly 1989; 67 (Suppl 2, Pt 2), 311-351.
2. Rodriguez PG. Using the International Classification of Impairments, Disability and Handicaps in surveys: the care for Spain. World Health Statistical Quarterly 1989; 42: 161-166.
3. Furrie AD. The Canadian database on disability issues: a national application of the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 344-349.
4. Tepper S, Sutton J, Beatty P, DeJong G. Alternative definitions of disability: relationship to health care expenditure. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 556-558.
5. Marks D. Models of Disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 85-91.
6. Campbell J, Oliver M. Disability politics. London: Routledge, 1996, p. 64.
7. Zola IK. Self identity and the naming question: reflections on the use of language of disability. Social Science and Medicine 1993; 2: 167-173.
8. Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.
9. Imrie R. Rethinking the relationship between disability, rehabilitation, and society. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 263-271.
10. Duckworth D. Measuring disability: the role of the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 338-343.
11. Tanenbaum S. Medicaid and disability: the unlikely entitlement. Milbank Quarterly, 1989: 67 (Suppl. 2, Pt 2): 288-309.
12. Greenfield L. Without universal coverage health care use data do not provide population health. Milbank Quarterly 1996; 74: 33-41.
13. Peters DJ. Human experience in disablement; the imperative of the ICIDH. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1995; 17: 135-144.
14. Chamie M. What does morbidity have to do with disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 323-337.
15. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Impairment. Disability and Handicaps, 1993 reprint. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1980.
16. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D. The prevalence of disability among adults: OPCS survey in Great Britain, report 1. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1988: 59.
17. Council of Europe. Evaluation of the use of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps in surveys and health related statistics. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1990.
18. Schoenman J. Description of the US working age disabled populations living in institutions and in the community. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 231-238.
19. Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 10.
20. Stevens D, Hetu R. Impairment and disability and handicap in audiology: towards a consensus. Audiology 1991; 30: 185-200.
21. Pollitt C. Managerialism and the public services: the Anglo-American experience. Blackwell: Oxford, 1990.
22. Hill M. The policy process: a reader. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
23. Frattalli CM. Perspectives on functional assessment: its use for policy making. Disability and Rehabilitation 1993; 15: 1-9.