Image interpretation keys for validation of global land-cover data sets

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1041-1049

  Kelly, Melissa ^a   Estes, John E ^a   Knight, Kevin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032845587     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Belward, A.S., (editor), 1996. IGBP-DIS Working Paper #13: The IGBP-DIS Global 1 km Land Cover Data Set (DISCOVER), Proposal and Implementation Plans, Report of the Land Cover Working Group of IGBP-DIS, IGBP Data and Information System Office.
2. Belward, A.S., J.E. Estes, and K.D. Kline, 1999. The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land cover data set DIScover. A project overview, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(9):1013-1020.
3. Chisnell, T.C., and G.E. Cole, 1958. Industrial Components: A photointerpretation key on industry, Photogrammetric Engineering, 24:590-602.
4. Choate, G. A., 1957. A selected annotated bibliography of aerial photointerpretation keys to forests and other natural vegetation, Journal of Forestry, 55:513-555.
5. Colwell, R.N., 1946. The estimation of ground conditions from aerial photographic interpretation of vegetation types, Photogrammetric Engineering, 12(2):151-161.
6. Davis, F.W., and D.M. Stoms, 1996. A spatial analytical hierarchy for GAP analysis, GAP Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning (M. Scott, T. Tear, and F. Davis, editors), American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing; Bethesda, Maryland.
7. Davis, F. W., D. M. Stoms, R. L. Church, W. J. Okin, and K. N. Johnson, 1996. Selecting biodiversity management areas, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options, University of California. Centers for Water and Wildlands Resources, Davis, California.
8. De Boissezon, H., G. Gonzales, B. Pous, and M. Sharman, 1993. Rapid estimates of crop acreage and production at a european scale using high resolution imagery: Operational review, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Operationalization of Remote Sensing, International Institute for Aerospace Survey And Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2:94-105.
9. Estes, J.E., E.J. Hajic, and L.R. Tinney, 1983. Fundamentals of image analysis: Analysis of visible and thermal infrared data, Manual of Remote Sensing, American Society of Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Falls Church, Virginia, 1:987-1124.
10. Eve, M.D., and J.W. Merchant, 1998. GAP Land Cover Mapping Protocols, A National Survey of Land Cover Mapping Protocols Used in the GAP Analysis Program, Final Report, internet site http:// www.calmit.unl.edu/gapmap/ 13 June 1999.
11. HRB-Singer, Inc., 1978. Interpretation Manual for Color and Color Infrared Aerial Photography for Surface Coal Mines, Bureau of Mines, United States Department of the Interior, Prepared for Division of Environment by HRB Singer, Inc.
12. Loelke, G.L., Jr., G.E. Howard, Jr., E.L. Schwertz, Jr., P.D. Lampert, and S.W. Miller, 1983. Land Use/Land Cover and Environmental Photointerpretation Keys, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1600, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
13. Madden, M., D. Jones, and L. Vilchek, 1999. Photointerpretation key for the Everglades vegetation classification system, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(2):171-177.
14. Scepan, J., 1999. Thematic validation of high resolution global land-cover data sets, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(9):1051-1060.
15. th Int. Geosci. and Remote Sensing Symp., Florence, Italy, 10-14 July, 2:1535-1537.
16. U.S. Defense Mapping Agency, 1995. Photo Interpretation Student Handbook, Module 2: Buildings, Transportation, Industries, Communications and Electronics, Cultural Areas; Module 3: Hydrography; Module 4: Cropland, Rangeland, Woodland, Wetlands; Module 5: Landforms and Exposed Surface Materials, Defense Mapping Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994. Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan, 620/R94/009, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
18. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1998. Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP), Coastal Services Center, (internet site http://www.csc.noaa.gov/ccap/).
19. U.S. Naval Photographic Intelligence Center, 1945. A Guide to Pacific Landforms and Vegetation for Use in Photographic Interpretation, OPNAV-16-VP107. Air Intelligence Group, Division of Naval Intelligence, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Navy Department, Washington, D.C.
20. U.S. Naval Reconnaissance and Technical Support Center, 1967. Image Interpretation Handbook, Vol. I., NAVAIR 10-35-685, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
21. U.S. War Department, 1942. Interpretation of Aerial Photographs, Technical Manual TM 5-246, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1943. Washington, D.C.
22. Walker, B., and W. Steffen, (editors), 1997. The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change: Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems; A Synthesis of GCTE and Related Research, The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme: A Study of Global Change of the International Council of Scientific Unions, Stockholm, Sweden.
23. Wharton, S.W., and M.F. Myers, (editors), 1997. MTPE EOS Data Products Handbook, Volume 1, TRMM & AM-1, Mission to Planet Earth (MTPE), Earth Observing System (EOS), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
24. Zsilinszky, V.G., 1963. Photographic Interpretation of Tree Species in Ontario, Department of Lands and Forests, Timber Branch, Ontario, Canada.