Outcome measures for inpatient neurorehabilitation settings

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 329-343

  Turner Stokes, Lynne ^a  

^a NORTHWICK PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; REHABILITATION CENTER; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032844497     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096020199389419     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alcott, D., Dixon, K., & Swann, R. (1997). The reliability of the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM): Differences in abstractness between FAM items. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19, 355-358.
2. Collin, C, Wade, D.T., Davis, S., & Horne, V. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10, 61-63.
3. Hall, K.M., Hamilton, B.B., Gordon, W.A., & Zasler, N.D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 60-74.
4. Hall, K.M., Mann, N., High W.M., Wright, J., Kreuzer, J.S., & Wood, D. (1996). Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: Ceiling effects of the FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS and CIQ. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11, 27-39.
5. Hamilton, B. B., Granger C.V., Sherwin, F.S., Zielezny, M., & Tashman, J.S. (1987). A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In J.M. Fuhrer, (Ed.), Rehabilitation outcomes; analysis and measurement. (pp. 137-147). Baltimore: Brookes.
6. Mahoney, F.I., & Barthel, D.W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
7. McPherson, K., Berry, A., & Pentland, B., (1997). Relationships between cognitive impairment and functional performance after brain injury, as measured by the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 241-257.
8. McPherson, K., & Pentland, B. (1997). Disability in patients following traumatic brain injury - Which measure? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 20, 1-10.
9. McPherson, K., Pentland, B., Cudmore, S.F., & Prescott, R.J. (1996). An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment measure (FIM+FAM). Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, 341-347.
10. Nyein, K., McMichael, L., & Turner-Stokes, L. (1999). Can a Barthel Score be derived from the FIM? Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 56-63.
11. Shah, S., Vanclay, F., & Cooper, B. (1990). Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703-709.
12. Turner-Stokes, L., Nyein, K., Turner-Stokes, T., & Gatehouse, C. (1999). The UK FIM+FAM: Development and evaluation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 277-288.
13. Turner-Stokes, L., Nyein, K., & Halliwell, D. (1999). The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA) - a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 253-268.
14. Turner-Stokes, L., Tonge, P., Hunter, M., Nielson, S., & Robinson, I. (1998). The Northwick Park Dependency Scale - a measure of nursing dependency which translates into care needs in the community. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 304-319.
15. Turner-Stokes, L., & Turner-Stokes, T. (1997). The use of standardised outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clinical Rehabilitation, 11, 306-313.
16. Wade, D.T. (1992). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.