Conversion of lens slit lamp photographs into physical light-scattering units

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 2151-2157

  Van Den Berg, Thomas J T P ^a   Coppens, Joris C ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DENSITOMETRY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LENS; LIGHT SCATTERING; PHOTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLIT LAMP;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SCATTERING, RADIATION;

EID: 0032841563     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chylack LT Jr, Lee MR, Tung WH, Cheng HM. Classification of human senile cataractous change by the American Cooperative Cataract Research Group (CCRG) Method I. Instrumentation and technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:424-431.
2. Sparrow JM. Methods of clinical cataract grading: two systems compared. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1209-1211.
3. Taylor HR, Lee JA, Wang F, Munoz B. A comparison of two photographic systems for grading cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:529-532.
4. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, et al. The lens opacities classification system, version III (LOCS III). Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
5. Wolf E, Gardiner JS. Studies on the scatter of light in the dioptric media of the eye as a basis of visual glare. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74:338-345.
6. Allen MJ, Vos JJ. Ocular scattered light and visual performance as a function of age. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;44:717-727.
7. Sigelman J, Trokel SL, Spector A. Quantitative biomicroscopy of lens light backscatter. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92:437-442.
8. Brown NAP, Bron AJ, Ayliffe W, Sparrow J, Hill AR. The objective assessment of cataract. Eye. 1987;1:234-246.
9. Elliott DB, Hurst MA. Assessing the effect of cataract: a clinical evaluation of the Opacity Lensmeter 701. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:257-263.
10. Hockwin O, Sasaki K, Lerman S. Evaluating cataract development with the Scheimpflug camera. In: Masters BM, ed. Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Ophthalmology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990:281-318.
11. Yager D, Liu C-L, Kapoor N, Yuan R. Relations between three measures of ocular forward light scatter and two measures of backward light scatter. In: Technical Digest on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (O.S.A., Washington, DC) 1993;3:174-177.
12. Thurston GM, Hayden DL, Burrows P, et al. Quasielastic light scattering study of the living human lens as a function of age. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:197-207.
13. Chylack LT Jr, Rosner B, Cheng H-M, McCarthy D, Pennett M. Sources of variance in the objective documentation of human cataractous change with Topcon SL-45 and Neitz-CTR retroillumination photography and computerized image analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1987;6:1381-1390.
14. van den Berg TJTP. Depth dependent forward light scattering by donor lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1157-1166.
15. van den Berg TJTP. Light scattering by donor lenses as function of depth and wavelength. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sc. 1997;38:1321-1332.
16. van den Berg TJTP, Spekreijse H. Light scattering model for donor lenses as function of depth. Vision Res. 1999;39:1437-1445.
17. van de Hulst HC. Light Scattering by Small Particles. New York: Dover Publications; 1981.
18. Willis CE, Bencomo JA. Logistic representation of the sensitometric response of screen-film systems: empirical validation. Med Phys. 1990;17:676-679.
19. van den Berg TJTP. Analysis of intraocular straylight, especially in relation to age. Optom Vision Sci. 1995;72:52-59.